Category Archives: LEGISLATION

Clarification of who is covered under the 1986 National Vaccine Injury Compensation Act

 

To clarify a few aspects for anyone who is still unclear on the court/compensation bifurcation of the 1986 Act:  Tom Stavola “Freedom and Ethics Alliance”

1. Any vaccine recommended for routine administration for children, or adults and children, is “covered” (must go through the NVICP). Shingles/Herpes Zoster vaccine is adult recommended only, and so one can utilize the court systems for this vaccine.
2. In order to sue in state courts, one must first use the NVICP. After the program has made a decision, the petitioner can choose to sue in state court. However, the 2011 Supreme Court Bruesewitz V. Wyeth – the unavoidably unsafe case – precludes petitioners from suing vaccine manufacturers for product design defects, even after going through the NVICP. One can; however, sue the vaccine manufacturer for fraud, for example.
3. In order to sue doctors in state courts, one must first use the NVICP, then you may decide to sue in state court with one of two claims: 1) medical malpractice; or 2) lack of informed consent. It’s typically almost impossible to be successful with either claim; however, you may have a slightly higher probability of winning “lack of informed consent” if one wasn’t provided the Vaccine Information Statement.
4. The 21st Century Cures Act pushes all claims related to death of unborn child into the NVICP, since this was a legal loophole prior to 2016 (which many were capitalizing on).
5. The proposal for amending the Vaccine Injury Table essentially allows the CDC – as Wayne mentioned heretofore – to direct any new recommended vaccines for pregnant women onto the Vaccine Injury Table. Thus, there will be no opportunity to sue in state court for new recommended vaccines, but if one experiences an adverse event that falls into the strict constraints of the vaccine injury table, your probability of compensation is significantly increased. Of course, for any non-table injury, proof of causation is much more arduous.

VLA Comment:  The 1986 act gave immunity to all vaccine providers and directed compensation claims to special masters at the vaccine court.  The funding for compensation and court comes from an excise tax to the consumer per vaccine.  In other words those who are potentially harmed are paying into the fund.  It is not funded by the manufacturers or government.

UN Agenda 21 “Bottom Up” USA cities who are members of ICLEI

ICLEILocal Governments for Sustainability, founded in 1990 as the “International Council for Local Environmental Initiatives”, is an international organization of local governments and national and regional local government organizations that have made a commitment to sustainable development

 THE LIST OF USA CITIES SIGNED UP ON ICLEI

Such as:  DesMoines, Iowa, Ashland, Aspen, Bellingham, Bridgeport, Conn. and on and on….

Is your city signed up? Here is an employment opportunity in Iowa, for example, on how the UN Agenda 21 works in cities and states “bottom up” under the guise of sustainablity

UN Iowa

VLA COMMENT:  This is a vast network created by UN AGENDA 21 forces to implement the agenda from “bottom up”.

Below is the 2018 World Congress of ICLEI…they are still going at their One World Order plans.

ICLEI WORLD CONGRESS 2018….

For the past 25 years, ICLEI has maintained that local action is at the center of global change. Our multidisciplinary network continues to develop and apply practical strategies, tools and methodologies that bring about tangible local progress worldwide. The growing ICLEI Network works collaboratively in more than 100 countries, leveraging local assets to address pressing urban challenges and impact over 25 percent of the global urban population.

Iowa Supreme Court: Innocent people who plead guilty can challenge their convictions

 

Iowa Supreme Court: Innocent people who plead guilty can challenge their convictions

For the first time, the Iowa Supreme Court has ruled that people who plead guilty to crimes may challenge their convictions if new evidence of their innocence emerges.

The court ruled Friday in a 4-3 decision in the case of Jacob L. Schmidt, who pleaded guilty in 2007 of sexually abusing his 14-year-old half-brother the year before. Years later, in 2014, Schmidt’s half-brother began telling others that the abuse never occurred.

READ MORE…

 

Rhode Island Resolution to Congress: Repeal Law Protecting Big Pharma

Rhode Island Urges Congress to Repeal Law Protecting Big Pharma from Vaccine Injuries and Deaths: Subpoena CDC Whistleblower

This Resolution was Introduced By: Senators Metts, Morgan, Paolino, Crowley, and Quezada

Date Introduced: March 20, 2018

Referred To: Senate Health & Human Services  READ MORE…

Full Resolution found here.

Utah Legislation: FREE RANGE KIDS

First Ever Free Range Kids Bill Just Passed in Utah

A new law set to go into effect on May 8 2018 in Utah will be the first of its kind in America. SB 65 (Child Neglect Amendments) will change what the state of Utah recognizes as neglect to eliminate certain innocuous and natural activities such as children playing in their front yards, walking to school, and otherwise being children.

The law comes as a reaction to a growing movement of total control over families and children being exercised by the state and local governments, social “services” agencies, and schools. One such example is a Maryland couple whose children were held by police due to the alleged neglect of allowing them to walk home alone from a park

The law works by redefining the term “neglect,” pointing out that neglect does not include the following:

  • “permitting a child, whose basic needs are met and who is of sufficient age and maturity to avoid harm or unreasonable risk of harm, to engage in independent activities, including:
  • (A) traveling to and from school, including by walking, running, or bicycling;
  • (B) traveling to and from nearby commercial or recreational facilities;
  • (C) engaging in outdoor play;
  • (D) remaining in a vehicle unattended
  • (E) remaining at home unattended; or
  • (F) engaging in a similar independent activity.” READ MORE…

STUDY: HPV-Pharmaceutical Companies’ Role in State Vaccination Policymaking

Pharmaceutical Companies’ Role in State Vaccination Policymaking: The Case of Human Papillomavirus Vaccination

Abstract

Objectives. We sought to investigate roles that Merck & Co Inc played in state human papillomavirus (HPV) immunization policymaking, to elicit key stakeholders’ perceptions of the appropriateness of these activities, and to explore implications for relationships between health policymakers and industry.

Methods. We used a series of state case studies combining data from key informant interviews with analysis of media reports and archival materials. We interviewed 73 key informants in 6 states that were actively engaged in HPV vaccine policy deliberations.

Results. Merck promoted school-entry mandate legislation by serving as an information resource, lobbying legislators, drafting legislation, mobilizing female legislators and physician organizations, conducting consumer marketing campaigns, and filling gaps in access to the vaccine. Legislators relied heavily on Merck for scientific information. Most stakeholders found lobbying by vaccine manufacturers acceptable in principle, but perceived that Merck had acted too aggressively and nontransparently in this case.

Conclusions. Although policymakers acknowledge the utility of manufacturers’ involvement in vaccination policymaking, industry lobbying that is overly aggressive, not fully transparent, or not divorced from financial contributions to lawmakers risks undermining the prospects for legislation to foster uptake of new vaccines.

READ MORE…

Neglected Child for Religious Reasons (statute)

2151.03 Neglected child defined – failure to provide medical or surgical care for religious reasons.

(A) As used in this chapter, “neglected child” includes any child:

(1) Who is abandoned by the child’s parents, guardian, or custodian;

(2) Who lacks adequate parental care because of the faults or habits of the child’s parents, guardian, or custodian;

(3) Whose parents, guardian, or custodian neglects the child or refuses to provide proper or necessary subsistence, education, medical or surgical care or treatment, or other care necessary for the child’s health, morals, or well being;

(4) Whose parents, guardian, or custodian neglects the child or refuses to provide the special care made necessary by the child’s mental condition;

(5) Whose parents, legal guardian, or custodian have placed or attempted to place the child in violation of sections 5103.16 and 5103.17 of the Revised Code;

(6) Who, because of the omission of the child’s parents, guardian, or custodian, suffers physical or mental injury that harms or threatens to harm the child’s health or welfare;

42 U.S.C. 1396f. Similarly, although Congress granted HHS authority to conduct research, experiments, and demonstrations related to occupational illnesses in the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970, such authority did not include the power to require “medical examination, immunization, or treatment for those who object thereto on religious grounds, except where such is necessary for the protection of the health or safety of others.” 29 U.S.C. 669(a)(5).

Summary of Content
39 states, the District of Columbia and Guam have laws providing that parents or caretakers who fail to provide medical assistance to a child because of their religious beliefs are not criminally liable for harm to the child. There is also no Federal requirement that a parent or legal guardian provide a child any medical treatment that is against the religious beliefs of the parent or legal guardian.1
At the time Congress passed the Child Abuse Prevention & Treatment Act in 1974 to create a uniform approach to child abuse, it deferred to the Department of Health, Education and Welfare (now Health and Human Services) to determine the religious exemption policies of the act.2 HEW mandated that the states adopt religious exemptions to child neglect before they could receive federal funding for state child-protection programs.3 Although the department adopted new regulations in 1983 striking down this requirement,4 few states have repealed these religious exemption laws. Most of these statutes require that in order for religious beliefs to be a valid reason for denying a child medical care, the religion must be a recognized church or a religious denomination. The Supreme Court had not addressed whether or not neglect exemptions for religious purposes violate the Establishment Clause.5

VLA COMMENT: Then why have judges forced medical treatments such as chemotherapy on underaged children such as those in the Amish community?

BITCOIN EXPLAINED (must watch…whoa)

Watch video (two hours and well worth it for a one time education)

VLA Comment: Clarified a lot. Question though:re:  IMF how does China in regards to BRICS fit in…are they going to merge someday?China is in both…tells you something. The United States may be well served to join both like China

Int’l Vaccine News: Italy mandantes, Germany fines, Sweden rejects mandates

Vaccine Injury Awareness Day /

Italy Mandates / Germany Considers Fines / Sweden Rejects Mandates

Secretary European Forum for Vaccine Vigilance (EFVV)
London, United Kingdom

May 27, 2017 — Saturday the 3rd of June 2017 is International Vaccine Injury Awareness Day. Demonstrations are being organized in cities all over Europe. To see the list and take part in a protest near you, please visit the official ‘Light a Candle’ website: http://lightacandle.eu/main, and while you are there, make sure to light the virtual candle by simply clicking on it. Many will also light real candles in their homes or in public places in sympathy and support for all victims of vaccination. Please make an effort to join us in this powerful event. Here’s why it is so important:

Just as Jackson State University in Mississippi USA published a study this month revealing that the unvaccinated have much lower rates of chronic illness than the vaccinated (https://worldmercuryproject.org/news/unvaccinated-children-much-lower-rates-chronic-illness-jackson-state-study-finds/), the Italian government voted a law making vaccines mandatory for school attendance and exams (http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-39983799): a shocking breach of fundamental human rights! The law is not yet applicable but will be soon, so now is the time to protest vehemently.

The Germans are also clamping down on parents, not as severely as Italy but parents there may be fined for not seeking advice on vaccination for their children and daycare centres will be responsible for reporting parents who fail to seek vaccination advice, to the Ministry of Health: http://www.euronews.com/2017/05/26/germany-parents-face-fines-over-child-vaccinations.

The Swedes on the other hand have recently rejected 7 motions that would have promoted forced vaccinations. The Swedish Parliament decided forced vaccination policies are contrary to their citizens’ constitutional rights:
http://www.ageofautism.com/2017/05/sweden-votes-down-mandatory-vaccination.html

So: well done to Sweden and it’s a sad day for Democracy and Freedom of Choice in Italy and Germany! Let’s hope the Italian people can make their government withdraw this outrage before too many children become the victims of unnecessary harm, and the German government will decide against imposing fines and mandates.

Please attend a ‘Light a Candle’ event in your country!

EFVV

International Vaccine Injury Awareness Day