Category Archives: LEGISLATION

Parental Rights Under Attack

Parental Rights Under Attack (Again) … This Time with SB18: Bill of Rights for the Children and Youth of California

Parental rights is a hot topic in the US these days, as more parents feel an increasing encroachment by the government into how they raise their family. Now, this ongoing issue between parents and the State has reached an all new level with the introduction of bill SB18, otherwise known as the “Bill of Rights for the Children and Youth of California.”


SB 18 Opposition Analysis

Here’s California Progressinve take on SB18:  Shouldn’t a bill that is supposed to be a Bill of Rights for Children focus on children instead of tax code?


North Carolina Congresswoman Virginia Foxx, a Republican, has introduced new legislation that, taken to its logical end, might eventually provision for employers to force their employees to be vaccinated under the guise of “wellness.”  House Resolution 1313, known as the “Preserving Employee Wellness Programs Act,” contains certain provisions for “disease prevention” that, should employees refuse them, might end up costing them their jobs. That, or employees could face penalties in the form of ostracization or even higher insurance rates.  READ MORE….

VLA COMMENT: California already passed a law in tandem with SB 77 which prohibits public and private education for any child that is not fully vaccinated.  This law targeting Daycare Centers prohibits employment or volunteering to anyone who has not gotten vaccinated.  This is virtually the first time that the government mandate vaccines for employment.


Harvard Trained Immunologist Demolishes California Pro-Mass Vaccination Legislation

The following open letter written by a PhD Immunologist completely demolishes the current California legislative initiative to remove all vaccine exemptions.

Read Letter….send to Legislators

VLA Comment: Clear and excellent.  Send en mass to your legislators. Dr. Tetyana clarifies the non-communicablity of various vaccines that are touted as dangerous to immunocompromised individual. She easily dispels this myth of contagion.

Homeschoolers in danger: Federal bill sponsored by Iowa’s Steve King

For many on the outside looking in, the newly purposed House bill H.R.610 looks like a win for homeschooling families and their supporters. It looks like those who have been unable to afford private, or homeschooling will now be given this option. So, why are these people opposed to the bill?

School vouchers created by H.R. 610, the Choices in Education Act of 2017, “would be a slippery slope toward more federal involvement and control in homeschooling,” asserts William Estrada, director of federal relations for the Home School Legal Defense Association (HSLDA). Is Estrada correct? Can this favorable bill be used by a future hostile left to control and maintain the homeschoolers? Will they be regulated into the same stupid curriculum that is destroying the minds of millions of children in our public schools? Read More…

VLA Comment: I can tell you this.  Bill Gates has been buying up major homeschool programs and inserting the Common Core curriculum. Bill Gates’ victory in California was an awesome double win for the Gates.  His minions force kids who don’t vaccinate out of public and private school and then provide them (without their knowledge) virtual education packed with Common Core.  Although virtual education seems like a good thing as to educate those in developing countries who lack a good system of education. Between Afrika and America, the whole world will be brainwashed with a common ideology and thus easily ruled by a global government. Many good things have been skewed by suspect interests.

Post Script: There was also a bill in Iowa this year (2017) that failed, fortunately. It proposed that there be  health oversight agencies monitoring homeschools.  Bills like HR610 smells like the vaccine establishment are now focusing on making sure that they get homeschools under control…then vaccinated.

Federal bill seeks to cap non-economic drug injuries to $250,000

In HR 1215, Rep. King of Iowa unfavorably targets the healthcare “consumer”, who irreparably damaged by “standard of care drugs” and mandated vaccines, is by the enactment of this bill,  limited and capped from receiving just compensation.

HR 1215 sponsored by Rep. King, is a weak and unfortunate effort, at the expense of drug or vaccine damaged consumers, to save the Federal government a puported $65 Billion of dollars (over a decade)

Rep. King fails to support the directive of Tom Price and President Trump to reduce costly federal medical expenditures.  In fact, public analysis shows that the cost to insurance companies and the federal government of deaths and injury from top down policy “standard of care” drugs and mandated vaccines is the red column elephant in the room.  An analysis of cost-effectiveness of vaccine mandates as potentially administrated by a Vaccine Science and Integrity Commission headed by Robert F. Kennedy, jr., according to a draft of our recent analysis of the meningitis vaccine, the deletion of the meningitis vaccine (Menatra) and other vaccines from the ACIP recommendations may save the Federal government trillions, not billions of dollars over time.

Excerpts from HR 1215, Rep. King (IA)

(b) noneconomic damages.—In any health care lawsuit, the amount of non-economic damages, if available, shall not exceed $250,000, regardless of the number of parties against whom the action is brought or the number of separate claims or actions brought with respect to the same injury.

The jury shall not be informed about the maximum award for noneconomic damages. An award for noneconomic damages in excess of $250,000 shall be reduced either before the entry of judgment, or by amendment of the judgment after entry of judgment…

HR 1215 Read NCOW Letter



S2943 is over 3,000 pages.  Senate Sponsor JOHN MC CAIN

It now goes to President Obama for his signature *

TRUMP CANNOT WORK WITH RUSSIA AGAINST ISIS unless Russia gives up Crimea and Ukraine

EXCERPT:  None of the funds authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2017 for the Department of Defense may be used for any bilateral military-to-military cooperation between the Governments of the United States and the Russian Federation until the Secretary of Defense, in coordination with the Secretary of State, certifies to the appropriate congressional committees that—

(1) the Russian Federation has ceased its occupation of Ukrainian territory and its aggressive activities that threaten the sovereignty and territorial integrity of Ukraine and members of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization; and…  READ MORE…

DOWNLOAD:   s2943-subtitle-d-matters-relating-to-the-russian-federation


  • VLA COMMENT:  The Congress just passed a bill S2943, that disallows Trumps from engaging with Putin to defeat Isis unless Russia abandons Crimea and Ukraine. This bill will be signed by Obama. STRATEGY: In order to overturn such a bill to allow Trump and his cabinet to engage freely in relations with Russia, It must  become clear that the White House provided birth certificate of Obama is not authentic providing no proof that he is born in the US and therefore is not the legitimate president and therefore has no authority to sign such bills as the recent Defense bill. And therefore, no bill ever signed by President Obama is legitimate and all must be re-signed or vetoed by President Trump. SEE birther forensic document video


  • Dec. 15, 2016 Press Conference on Obama Birth Certificate

HR 34/ 21st. Century Cures Act: Covert Federally Induced Abortion


Monday, December 5th with a 5:30 p.m. roll call vote on the motion to invoke cloture on the motion to concur in the House amendment to the Senate amendment to H.R. 34, the 21st Century Cures Act.  Amend HR 34 to REMOVE Sections 3091, 3092, and 3093 prior to voting that shield drug companies and vaccine administrators from liability for fetal injuries and deaths caused by vaccines marketed for and given to pregnant woman.

 CDC & Independent Study corroborates 4,250% increase in miscarriage & stillbirth reports associated with the flu vaccines.   

The general perception, worldwide, was that 2009 was the “year” of the experimental monovalent, 2009 A-H1N1, pandemic influenza vaccine on pregnant women. The Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) reports of spontaneous abortions and stillbirths following the administering of the 2009 A-H1N1 vaccine were more than “100” spontaneous abortion and stillbirth reports in temporal association with the 2009 A-H1N1 flu shot. The independent Goldman study in cooperation with our organization, NCOW, (link above) found a total of 174 VAERS fetal-death reports in 2009/10 flu season as compared to “4” and “21” fetal-demise events in the prior 2008/9. In percentages this is equivalent to a 4,250 increase in miscarriages and stillbirths. It is alarming that the CDC chose to hide from OB/GYNs and the public the massive spike in fetal-death reports to VAERS, in real time, as well as the potentially causal relationship between the two. The CDC was aware of the VAERS data, the 40-fold spike in fetal-demise reports relative to the prior year, ultimately corroborated by the CDC, however, rigorously covered up and therefore unknown to the public and its legislators.  READ LETTER T SENATORS: 21st-century-leg

California Bil AB499 signed into law: 12 year can get vaccines without parents knowledge

This bill passed in 2011, but not much has been said about it. Did you know? California Governor Jerry Brown thinks your 12 year old child is old enough to competently read and digest this information and to decide whether or not to accept this vaccine and/or the Hepatitis B jab without your knowledge or consent. READ THE LIBERTY BEACON…

VLA comment: Its a 2012 law, but many states want to pass this kind of bill.  What I would do is attach a codicil that acknowledges that if minor children can choose medical treatments (such as vaccines)  without parent knowledge then they should be able to choose to have an abortion and see if that gets passed with Republicans at the helm.

California: Minors, Medical Care Consent

Beginning on January 1, 2012, a California law (known as AB 499 or Chapter 652, Statutes of 2011) expands the legal authority of minors 12 years and older o consent to confidential medical services for the prevention of sexually transmitted diseases (STDs) without their parents’ consent (or knowledge) READ PDF)…