Bruce Lipton, Cellular Biologist on Vaccination
Leave a reply
Category Archives: Doctors Speak Out
Bought (the movie) Snippets
Killing Premature babies with mature vaccine schedules NURSE WHISTLEBLOWER SPEAKS OUT
The JAMA study Michelle references in this InfoWars interview confirmed that vaccinations given to ELBW infants can cause serious adverse events, including fever, which necessitates painful, invasive and expensive procedures, including blood and urine cultures. Infants are then exposed to empirical antibiotic therapy for several days until the results of the cultures are known. The disruption to the gut-microbiome of a newborn can have a life-long impact of bad health and autoimmune disease. Current research provides evidence that the gut microbiome interacts with many physiological systems and metabolic processes in the developing infant. Disruptions as such a tender age can have an adverse impact on growth, development, and general health of the infant. READ MORE>>>
The Tiniest ones…Doctors ignore premature birth weights when giving vaccines
African Americans: CDC Whistleblower admits hiding data on Autism and African Americans
Toni Bark, Pediatric MD
6 videos: Suzanne Humphries, MD, Nephrologist (Dissolving Illusions)
GREAT SPEECH: Attorney Speaks Up about Vaccines (SB277) “riveting”
Confessions of an RX Drug Pusher
MUMPS FRAUD: Whistleblower files to compel
Two former Merck & Co Inc scientists accusing the drugmaker of falsifying tests of its exclusive mumps vaccine said in a court filing on Monday that Merck is refusing to respond to questions about the efficacy of the vaccine.
Attorneys at Constantine Cannon, who represent the scientists, asked U.S. Magistrate Judge Lynne Sitarski of the Eastern District of Pennsylvania to compel Merck to respond to their discovery request, which asks the company to give the efficacy of the vaccine as a percentage.
Instead of answering the question, the letter said, Merck has been consistently evasive, using “cut-and-paste” answers saying it cannot run a new clinical trial to determine the current efficacy, and providing only data from 50 years ago.
“Merck should not be permitted to raise as one of its principal defenses that its vaccine has a high efficacy, which is accurately represented on the product’s label, but then refuse to answer what it claims that efficacy actually is,” the letter said.
A representative of Merck could not immediately be reached for comment. (See: Merck accused of stonewalling in mumps vaccine antitrust lawsuit)