DID THE FEDERAL AGENCY HHS…through administrative rule take over VACCINES….that authority which belongs to the States
The enactment of The PREP Act (Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness 2005) was declared by the Secretary of HHS on March 10, 2020.
This allowed our nation to address the COVID “pandemic” by extending legal protections to manufacturers of medical supplies and equipment, plus allowing our federal government to harness the resources necessary to combat this virus.
This also extended to the states for them to enact Emergency Powers that restricted businesses, social gatherings, focusing medical responses to COVID only.
At the same time, the Secretary of HHS forwarded his intentions via a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) to remove shoulder injury (SIRVA) and syncope (fainting) from the NVICP, thus any claims for injuries resulting in shoulder injuries or the result of injured incurred after falling because of fainting. READ MORE…
Consultation document: changes to Human Medicine Regulations to support the rollout of COVID-19 vaccines
A temporary authorization of the supply of an unlicensed vaccine could be given by the UK’s licensing authority under regulation 174 of the Human Medicines Regulations (see below). A COVID-19 vaccine would only be authorized in this way if the UK’s licensing authority was satisfied that there is sufficient evidence to demonstrate the safety, quality and efficacy of the vaccine. ‘Unlicensed’ does not mean ‘untested’: this temporary authorization process exists to address the possibility that, in certain situations of public health need, the licensing authority may consider that the balance of risk and benefit to patients justifies the temporary supply of the relevant vaccine pending the issue of a product licence. Regulation 345 of the Human Medicine Regulations transposes into UK law a requirement of EU law that key actors in the medicines supply chain cannot generally be sued in the civil courts for the consequences resulting from the use of an unlicensed product, or a new use of a licensed product, that a national licensing authority is recommending in order to deal with certain specific health threats. READ More...
VLA Comment: It is a long compilation by UK Goverment changing regulations to accommodate worldwide vaccination of Covid Vaccine…but I don’t see “mandating” vaccines, unless I missed it by their use of more subtle language. 2 things we have to look out for….
1) I believe in the USA the Epidemic Intelligence Service (EIS) will be orchestrating the distribution.We should be alert…alert Trump… to make sure the Military is not going to be used as the usual guinea pigs to get this vaccine, or the result will be after all the money Trump spent on the military…he will have a lot of incoherent and potentially nano-chipped Deep State controlled Military. (same goes for any country that is planning on mandating this vaccine to their military…potentially then there will be AI Global control of all militaries…sounds like science fiction…but don’t dismiss it.
2) In the USA it is the states that control vaccines and “mandating” not the Federal Government. Be far sighted…will the school children be “mandated”. Can we get on a plane without it, etc.
H.B. 1090, as amended, WAS PASSED into law during a special session held by the state legislature on Apr. 22, 2020 during the COVID-19 lockdown. Virginia Governor Ralph Northam, MD signed the bill into law with an effective date of July 1, 2021.6
The new law automatically adds up to 10 more doses of five vaccines for daycare and school children, including vaccines that the Virginia legislature previously voted against adding to the schedule, such as the very expensive meningococcal vaccine and HPV vaccine for boys.
Because a law was passed in 2020 that allows state public health officials to automatically add every CDC recommended vaccine to the list of vaccines required for daycare and school entry—without public hearings or a vote by elected representatives in the legislature.
VLA Comment: This includes and confirms support for Bill Gates’s intention to put the Covid-19 RNA/DNA untested nanotech vaccine as mandatory for school children.
Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg wrote high court’s unanimous opinion:
The Supreme Court unanimously upheld a federal statute that forbids encouraging illegal aliens to remain in the U.S. unlawfully in a decision Thursday.
A clear-sighted judge chose to read the law and saw that NY law clearly gives physicians the right to issue a medical exemption to vaccines and other procedures. NY DoH had issued a directive and a form to physicians which appeared to compel them to follow the vaccine exemption guidelines of the CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP). As it happens, only people with prior anaphylactic reactions to vaccines qualify according to ACIP.
Unvaccinated people are automatically disqualified (no prior vaccine reaction is possible in the absence of any vaccination), as are those with other reasons for medical exemptions, such as genetic mutations, Gillian Barre Syndrome, etc., etc.
South Dakota Legislation: NO MANDATED VACCINES WHATSOEVER!!!
“House Bill 1235 states that ‘No public or nonpublic post secondary educational institutions may mandate any immunizations for school entry. A public or private post secondary educational institution may request any student to submit medical records. No educational institution may use coercive means to require immunization’.”
“The bill would make it a Class 1 misdemeanor for ‘any educational institution, medical provider, or person to compel another to submit to immunization,’ according to the bill text.”
“’Every person has the inalienable right to bodily integrity, free from any threat or compulsion that the person accepts any medical intervention, including immunization. No person may be discriminated against for refusal to accept an unwanted medical intervention, including immunization,’ the bill states.”
South Dakota is a major Red State by far