Category Archives: Nanotechnology & Science Lab

UGH! Genetic Engineering using Crispr Technology & Covid-19 (6/25/2020)

Leave a reply

CRISPR gene editing in human embryos wreaks chromosomal mayhem

Three studies showing large DNA deletions and reshuffling heighten safety concerns about heritable genome editing.

Excerpts: 

Unpredictable repair

The changes are the result of DNA-repair processes harnessed by genome-editing tools. CRISPR–Cas9 uses a small strand of RNA to direct the Cas9 enzyme to a site in the genome with a similar sequence. The enzyme then cuts both strands of DNA at that site, and the cell’s repair systems heal the gap.

The researchers used CRISPR–Cas9 to create mutations in the POU5F1 gene, which is important for embryonic development. Of 18 genome-edited embryos, about 22% contained unwanted changes affecting large swathes of the DNA surrounding POU5F1. They included DNA rearrangements and large deletions of several thousand DNA letters — much greater than typically intended by researchers using this approach.

READ MORE…

COVID-19

EXCERPTS: But the Stanford team that developed PAC-MAN needed an effective way to deliver it to the lung, where COVID-19 often does the most damage.  VLA COMMENT: Our research shows that the reason the LUNGS seem to be damaged by Covid-19 is because it is a NANO VIRUS.  Studies show that the use of Nanotechnology in humans have a consistent problem…it damages the Lungs.

Science daily paper Health Risks Of Nanotechnology: How Nanoparticles Can Cause Lung Damage, And How The Damage Can Be Blocked.

Nanovirus/Nanovaccine link:  BILL GATES TALKS ABOUT THE VACCINE

 

READ MORE…

Fauci: USA “Gain of Function research” ZOONOTICS: How to infect humans with animal viruses research

Leave a reply

Trump vs. Fauci

Anthony Fauci: USA “virus Gain of Function research”

ZOONOTICS: How to infect humans with animal viruses research

Zoonotic: Pertaining to a zoonosis: a disease that can be transmitted from animals to people or, more specifically, a disease that normally exists in animals but that can infect humans. There are multitudes of zoonotic diseases.

(Article by Matthew Cullinan Hoffman republished from LifeSiteNews.com)

The  potential scandal is magnified by the fact that the Chinese were not conducting these dangerous experiments on their own; much of the research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology labs was being advocated, defended, and funded by the leadership of the United States National Institutes of Health and the United States Agency for International Development, in coordination with the World Health Organization and various U.S. universities and institutes.

Dangerous “gain of function” studies on animal viruses promoted by Fauci and Collins

Anthony Fauci and Francis Collins have been publicly promoting and defending dangerous “gain of function” studies on viruses since the first experiments of the kind were announced in 2011. Such studies, which seek to make viruses infectious in new species of mammals and even humans, were being done in the Wuhan Institute of Virology, the suspected source of the COVID-19 outbreak that is now sweeping the world – and they were being done in part with funding from the National Institutes of Health, as well as the U.S. Agency for International Development.

“Gain of Function” research seeks to take animal viruses from bats, birds, and other non-human virus carriers, and to genetically modify them to alter their mode of functioning, enabling them to become infectious in other animal species, even in humans. Medical researchers have repeatedly expressed alarm regarding such experiments, arguing that they could inadvertently cause new pandemics.

Advocates of gain of function research ultimately prevailed when the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services began to allow funding for such experiments in 2018 – a decision that was publicly applauded by Anthony Fauci, whose NIAID began paying for the research at a U.S. facility. The approval, which appears in the document “Guiding Funding Decisions about Proposed Research Involving Enhanced Potential Pandemic Pathogens” explicitly allowed for the creation of viruses that could cause a pandemic, that is, a “potential pandemic pathogen” (PPP), even one whose potency has been enhanced artificially, if certain criteria are met.

VLA Comment: You might ask why we would have our researchers take animal viruses and force them to jump species to infect humans which would otherwise not occur in nature.  The answer, I heard was so that if a foreign nation develops a gain of function that allows an animal virus to infect a human…we would be prepared by doing it ourselves and then working on finding an antidote.  READ MORE…

Response to the Coronavirus is a CRIME AGAINST HUMANITY

Leave a reply

18:00 “DARPA” representative talks about PROFUSA

21:14 – 24:24 “DARPA” GRANTS/HYDROGEL
Nanoparticles fuse to existing tissue structuring an artificial scaffolding forwarding the trend towards Transhumanism. It becomes part of human biology.

35:00 Viruses can carry Nanotechnology via Liquid crystals, man made and natural (think tobacco mosiac virus).

Bill Gates Explains that the Covid Vaccine will Use Experimental Technology and Permanently Alter Your DNA

4 Replies

Bill Gates Explains that the Covid Vaccine will Use Experimental Technology and Permanently Alter Your DNA

Inactivated and live vaccines are what we consider “traditional” approaches. There are a number of COVID-19 vaccine candidates of both types, and for good reason: they’re well-established. We know how to test and manufacture them.

The downside is that they’re time-consuming to make. There’s a ton of material in each dose of a vaccine. (CDC vaccine excipients) Most of that material is biological, which means you have to grow it. That takes time, unfortunately.

That’s why I’m particularly excited by two new approaches that some of the candidates are taking: RNA and DNA vaccines. If one of these new approaches pans out, we’ll likely be able to get vaccines out to the whole world much faster. (For the sake of simplicity, I’m only going to explain RNA vaccines. DNA vaccines are similar, just with a different type of genetic material and method of administration.)

Here’s how an RNA vaccine works: rather than injecting a pathogen’s antigen into your body, you instead give the body the genetic code needed to produce that antigen itself. When the antigens appear on the outside of your cells, your immune system attacks them—and learns how to defeat future intruders in the process. You essentially turn your body into its own vaccine manufacturing unit.

Because RNA vaccines let your body do most of the work, they don’t require much material. That makes them much faster to manufacture. There’s a catch, though: we don’t know for sure yet if RNA is a viable platform for vaccines. Since COVID would be the first RNA vaccine out of the gate, we have to prove both that the platform itself works and that it creates immunity. It’s a bit like building your computer system and your first piece of software at the same time.” ~ Bill Gates

COMMENT: So, the rushed Covid-19 vaccine will not be a traditional vaccine. It will not be tested in any significant or standard capacity given the present state of emergency. It will be administered by the military, and it everyone on the planet will have to take it.

VLA Comment: Not mentioned is that the new Covid-19 vaccine will include a nanotechnology delivery

MIT chemical engineers have now developed a new series of lipid nanoparticles to deliver such vaccines. They showed that the particles trigger efficient production of the protein encoded by the RNA, and they also behave like an “adjuvant,” further boosting the vaccine effectiveness

Science daily paper Health Risks Of Nanotechnology: How Nanoparticles Can Cause Lung Damage, And How The Damage Can Be Blocked.

Excerpt from the Science Daily

The US government safety research states nanomaterials may interact with the human body in different ways than more conventional materials, due to their extremely small size. For example, studies have established that the comparatively large surface area of inhaled nanoparticles can increase their toxicity. Such small particles can penetrate deep into the lungs and may move to other parts of the body, including the liver and brain. (https://www.ohsrep.org.au/nanotechnology_-_a_new_hazard)

VLA COMMENT:  Is the Covid-19 virus itself enriched with nanoparticles?  Is that why we are seeing damage in the lungs…fibrosis, thombosis and the non effective drive to use ventilators.

For more on the possibility that both the vaccine and the manipulated Covid-19 virus contains nanobiological technolocy see:

https://vaccineliberationarmy.com/2020/05/12/covid-19-vaccine-nanoparticle-delivery-system-can-make-rna-vaccines-more-powerful/

Nanotechnology – a new hazard

Excerpt:

What are the possible dangers of nanotechnology?

Although most of the press coverage has been on the dangers of ‘nano-goo’ such as self-replicating particles that get out of control, or ‘nano-robots’, the real risks are much more simple, and real. The miniature size of nanomaterials and the way their surfaces are modified to increase the ease with which they can interact with biological systems – the very characteristics that make them attractive for applications in medicine and industry – makes nanomaterials potentially damaging for humans and the environment.

Nanoparticles are likely to be dangerous for three main reasons:

  1. Nanoparticles may damage the lungs. We know that ‘ultra fine’ particles from diesel machines, power plants and incinerators can cause considerable damage to human lungs. This is both because of their size (as they can get deep into the lungs) and also because they carry other chemicals including metals and hydrocarbons in with them.

  2. Nanoparticles can get into the body through the skin, lungs and digestive system. This may help create ‘free radicals’ which can cause cell damage and damage to the DNA. There is also concern that once nanoparticles are in the bloodstream they will be able to cross the blood-brain barrier.

  3. The human body has developed a tolerance to most naturally occurring elements and molecules that it has contact with. It has no natural immunity to new substances and is more likely to find them toxic.

The danger of contact with nanoparticles is not just speculation. As more research is undertaken, concerns increase. Here are some of the recent findings:

  • some nanoparticles cause lung damage in rats. Several studies have shown that carbon nanotubes, which are similar in shape to asbestos fibres, cause mesothelioma in the lungs of rats (see below)
  • other nanoparticles have been shown to lead to brain damage in fish and dogs
  • a German study found clear evidence that if discrete nanometer diameter particles were deposited in the nasal region (in rodents in this case), they completely circumvented the blood/brain barrier, and travelled up the olfactory nerves straight into the brain
  • inhaled carbon nanotubes can suppress the immune system by affecting the function of T cells, a type of white blood cell that organises the immune system to fight infections.

 

READ BILL GATES ARTICLE IN WAKING TIMES

 

COVID-19 VACCINE: Nanoparticle delivery system can make RNA vaccines more powerful

Leave a reply

“Another advantage of these vaccines is that we can quickly change the target disease,” he says. “We can make vaccines to different diseases very quickly just by tinkering with the RNA sequence.”

Nanoparticle delivery system can make RNA vaccines more powerful

Viruses as nanotechnoloy building blocks

Viruses as nanotechnology building blocks for materials and devices. (Nanowerk Spotlight) Geneticists regularly use viruses as vectors to introduce genes into cells that they are studying. … These viruses infect cells, deposit their DNA payloads, and take over the cells’ machinery to produce the desirable proteins

STUDY:  CRISPR DELIVERY

It was not your typical CRISPR experiment. The scientists had just injected a mouse’s tail with magnetic nanoparticles bound to an exotic virus containing today’s genome editor of choice. They then plopped the mouse belly-side down atop a block magnet about the size of a deck of cards, positioning it just so. Even with all their attention to detail, however, “we were never sure it would work,” admits bioengineer Gang Bao of Rice University. “We figured, let’s just see what happens.”

DNA Nanobots Can Fool the Immune System by Disguising Themselves as Viruses

Sometimes to help the body, you have to fool the body, which is why researchers from Harvard’s Wyss Institute of Biologically Inspired Engineering modeled their latest DNA nanodevice after those great immune-system evaders, viruses.

The whole project, outlined in a new paper published at ACS Nano, is pretty bizarre and cool—back in February 2012, researchers at Wyss announced that they had developed a robotic device fashioned out of DNA.

 

VLA COMMENT: Did they also “tinker” with the Covid-19 virus itself using nanotechnology nano mechanical device… into the virus sending it via aerosol communicability to the world amaging lungs and other organs?

VLA Covid-19 nanobot research notes

FEMA whistleblower: Covid-19 Vaccine: Merging Artificial Intelligence with Humans

Leave a reply


20 years working for XXX

Start 14:20

MERGING ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE WITH HUMANS
Some points:
1)the testing strategy is collecting everybody’s DNA
2) 3 important components of the new untested technology RNA vaccine
a. Human Fetal cells
b. Humanized Mouse
c. DARPA Hydragel Sensor

560 GENES linked to Cancer from aborted male fetus found in VACCINE

Leave a reply

MEDICAL HORROR: Genetic sequencing of common vaccine finds entire male human genome from aborted human baby… “a complete individual genome” with abnormal, modified genes… 560 genes linked to cancer

“What’s clear from this genetic sequencing is that the vaccine industry is inoculating children with engineered cancer. As CHD explains, the vaccines are deliberately formulated with cancer-causing genes which have been specifically modified to promote cancer tumors” (Mike Adams)

1- The fetal cell line was found to belong to a male fetus.

2- The cell line presents itself in such a way that it is likely to be very old, thus consistent with the declared line of the 1960s.

3- The fetal human DNA represented in this vaccine is a complete individual genome, that is, the genomic DNA of all the chromosomes of an individual is present in the vaccine.

4- The human genomic DNA contained in this vaccine is clearly, undoubtedly abnormal, presenting important inconsistencies with a typical human genome, that is, with that of a healthy individual.

5- 560 genes known to be associated with forms of cancer were tested and all underwent major modifications.

6- There are variations whose consequences are not even known, not yet appearing in the literature, but which still affect genes involved in the induction of human cancer.

7- What is also clearly abnormal is the genome excess showing changes in the number of copies and structural variants.

READ MORE…

VLA Comment:  Makes sensed that there is a probability that a fetus that has been aborted may have genes that are defective or faulty or disturbed due to the vaccine process.