This Resolution was Introduced By: Senators Metts, Morgan, Paolino, Crowley, and Quezada
Date Introduced: March 20, 2018
Referred To: Senate Health & Human Services READ MORE…
A new law set to go into effect on May 8 2018 in Utah will be the first of its kind in America. SB 65 (Child Neglect Amendments) will change what the state of Utah recognizes as neglect to eliminate certain innocuous and natural activities such as children playing in their front yards, walking to school, and otherwise being children.
The law comes as a reaction to a growing movement of total control over families and children being exercised by the state and local governments, social “services” agencies, and schools. One such example is a Maryland couple whose children were held by police due to the alleged neglect of allowing them to walk home alone from a park
The law works by redefining the term “neglect,” pointing out that neglect does not include the following:
“How much more radiation penetrates your body today compared to ten years ago? Is it twice as much, three times as much? No it is a quintillion times more – that is a one with 18 zeros.” Olle Johansson, PhD
Today we encounter a hundred thousand times the level of radiation from wireless technologies than we did decades ago. Yet the safety standards set by federal regulatory agencies are outdated. GENERATION ZAPPED investigates the potential dangers of prolonged exposure to Radio Frequencies (RF) from wireless technology,
its effects on our health and well-being, as well as the health and development of our children. So how can we uncover the facts and reduce our exposure to limit the associated health risks during this technological revolution? GENERATION ZAPPED attempts to do just that.
DR. TERESA HOLTROP is the Michigan Director of the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP). She recently testified in a case in Michigan in which a mom objects to vaccination. She was the witness for the divorced husband who wanted to vaccinate their 2.5 year old heretofore, unvaccinated, child. She testified that she is not an expert on vaccine injury, and that she gets her information about vaccines from the CDC website. Holtrop repeated stated that she “did not know” when counsel for the mother asked her questions related to vaccine risk.
VLA Comment: Unbelievable…Here is the Michigan Director of the AAP and hasn’t got a clue of what is in the vaccines or the adverse events. She represents most pediatricians. If you ask your pediatrician what are the CDC excipeints in vaccines he/she will not know.
Here is the CDC excipient chart…download it, highlight the poisonous ingredients and give it to your doctor after first asking him if he/she knows what is in the vaccines.CDC vaccine excipients
https://galacticconnection.com/71-of-military-age-americans-too-sick-to-join-study-says/?utm_source=Newsletter&utm_campaign=2e8784ae25-The+Daily+Alternative+News+Source+Jan+6%2C+2018&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_aebd2bb672-2e8784ae25-146555869&goal=0_aebd2bb672-2e8784ae25-146555869&mc_cid=2e8784ae25&mc_eid=76117c86df
VLA COMMENT: Could it be the vaccines given to pregnant mothers and young children to the tune of over 39 vaccine doses by the age of six with excipients such as formaldahyde, ethanol, bovine serum, dog kidney cells, human DNA, aluminum and mercury?
A 2016 study by UCLA and the University of Arizona showed that “the first influenza attack a child suffers can affect the way their lifelong immunity to the virus builds up.” Specifically, exposure to a wild influenza virus (meaning infection, not immunization by vaccine) provided “75% protection against severe infection and 80% protection against death for related flu viruses.”
VLA COMMENT: The article is very astrologically intense, but there are graphs of the crisis time lines and if you skim the article you can get the gist. Put WETWARE in our search engine and honker down on the details of the Disruptive Technologies & the emergence of an entirely new Sociopolitical-Economic Paradigm ~
©2015-2018, Nick Anthony Fiorenza, All Rights Reserved
Objectives. We sought to investigate roles that Merck & Co Inc played in state human papillomavirus (HPV) immunization policymaking, to elicit key stakeholders’ perceptions of the appropriateness of these activities, and to explore implications for relationships between health policymakers and industry.
Methods. We used a series of state case studies combining data from key informant interviews with analysis of media reports and archival materials. We interviewed 73 key informants in 6 states that were actively engaged in HPV vaccine policy deliberations.
Conclusions. Although policymakers acknowledge the utility of manufacturers’ involvement in vaccination policymaking, industry lobbying that is overly aggressive, not fully transparent, or not divorced from financial contributions to lawmakers risks undermining the prospects for legislation to foster uptake of new vaccines.