Brown signed the “End of Life Act” into law on Monday, and in doing so California joins four other states — Oregon, Washington, Vermont and Montana — where patients’ right to choose doctor-assisted death is protected either by law or court order. Read more…
Open letter to the NRA & Gun Owners of America
Does anyone wonder why these mass shootings are occurring in these last decades, usually perpetrated by young men? And the suicides! Have you noticed that suicides have become an epidemic in soldiers, adults in general and even children as young as seven?
READ LETTER Open letter NRA
A great find…
Am J Public Health. 2005 April; 95(4): 581–590.
Jacobson v Massachusetts: It’s Not Your Great-Great-Grandfather’s Public Health Law
The ruling and the argument:
Take for example this: Justice Harlan stated “There is, of course, a sphere within which the individual may assert the supremacy of his own will and rightfully dispute the authority of any human government, especially of any free government existing under a written constitution. But it is equally true that in every well-ordered society charged with the duty of conserving the safety of its members the rights of the individual in respect of his liberty may at times, under the pressure of great dangers, be subjected to such restraint, to be enforced by reasonable regulations, as the safety of the general public may demand.2(p29)” Read more…
This is interesting also: “…the Court said that it was the legislature’s prerogative to determine how to control the epidemic, as long as it did not act in an unreasonable, arbitrary or oppressive manner.2,39,40 Vaccination was a reasonable means of control: “The state legislature proceeded upon the theory which recognized vaccination as at least an effective if not the best known way in which to meet and suppress the evils of a smallpox epidemic that imperiled an entire population.”2(p31)”
For example, it noted that the law should not be understood to apply to anyone who could show that vaccination would impair his health or probably cause his death.
VLA Comment: The above ruling was meant to support the State’s position. But if we look at it as applying to both sides the question that this discussion raises regarding SB 277 & SB 792 is were we under the pressure of great dangers? Additionally, “Effective”Court ruling recognized that the vaccine needs “to be at least – effective”. The CDC admits the flu shot is not effective. We have prove that the vaccines are not effective by admission of the CDC (flu shot, ie.) and the fact that a percentage of the participants in both the measles and the whooping couph outbreak were fully vaccinated individuals.
Secondly: “legislature proceeded upon the theory which recognized vaccination as at least an effective if not the best known way in which to meet and suppress the evils…that imperiled an entire generation” Was the entire generation “imperiled”?. Can the vaccines which are ineffective meet and supress that which is evil. Is the measles virus evil when studies have shown that getting the early childhood measles protects against cancer. Moreover biotechnologist are genetically engineering the natural measles because they have discovered that getting the natural measles virus may cure cancer.
Perhaps we might argue that the theory of which the California legislators proceeded upon is faulty… that vaccines are effective. This theory is challenged by independent, non industry related scientists, researchers and doctors. If challenged the court would have to consider the current pro and con studies and science materials to see if the “theory” that the legislators followed is sound or questionable. We have the opportunity to submit our science.
California SB792 law
Re: SB 792: Let’s be clear what our soundbite concept should be: What we should be pointing out to the Governor is that SB 792 is A FIRST IN THE NATION BILL….A BILL IF PASSED INTO LAW, GIVES THE POWER TO THE STATE, the Government, TO MANDATE MEDICAL TREATMENTS, in this case namely vaccines. This is a law that sets precedence. It is the foundation bill/law to facilitate, in the future, other medical treatments….such as forced mental health drug implants, forced chemotherapy, lobotomies, etc.
The American History Of Compulsory Vaccination and its Ties to Eugenics By Att. Jonathan Emord
Amidst hysteria arising from a relatively small number of cases of measles (some 600 last year and some 150 this year), law makers would take away everyone’s rights to liberty and personal autonomy.
Given the likelihood that at least some of these draconian measures will pass, it is wise to reflect upon our history to see from whence this peculiar deviation from ordinary protection for liberty rights comes. It is also wise to appreciate that the law favoring compulsory vaccination is now scientifically anachronistic and that modern understanding of immunology enables us to employ measures that reduce the risk of disease carriage and transmission without forcibly tying down children and adults and injecting them with substances they do not wish to have in their bodies.
It will surprise many to learn that the concept of compulsory vaccination has national socialist roots in our country that spring from the same drive for a “master race” that led the Nazis to embrace eugenics (including forced sterilization) and dysgenics (including execution of the Jews and others deemed “undesirable”). It will surprise many to learn that the person most responsible for eliminating constitutional protections against such intrusions (the Fourteenth Amendment) is one regarded as among America’s greatest jurists and legal scholars, Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr. Holmes believed in eugenics and even dysgenics (execution of those whom he regarded as “feeble-minded,” “undesirable,” and “inadequate”). READ MORE..
A tsunami of vaccine bills flooded
the legislatures of 36 states in the
nation this year. Clearly, this orchestrated
wave of vaccine bills emanates
from an initiative driven by national
and international forces. Read more..Vaccines Acres USA October15_Opinion
A MATHEMATICAL discovery by Perth-based electrical engineer Dr David Evans may change everything about the climate debate, on the eve of the UN climate change conference in Paris next month.
A former climate modeller for the Government’s Australian Greenhouse Office, with six degrees in applied mathematics, Dr Evans has unpacked the architecture of the basic climate model which underpins all climate science.
So, the new improved climate model shows CO2 is not the culprit in recent global warming. But what is?
Dr Evans has a theory: solar activity. What he calls “albedo modulation”, the waxing and waning of reflected radiation from the Sun, is the likely cause of global warming.
He predicts global temperatures, which have plateaued, will begin to cool significantly, beginning between 2017 and 2021. The cooling will be about 0.3C in the 2020s. Some scientists have even forecast a mini ice age in the 2030s.
If Dr Evans is correct, then he has proven the theory on carbon dioxide wrong and blown a hole in climate alarmism. He will have explained why the doomsday predictions of climate scientists aren’t reflected in the actual temperatures. READ MORE…
Which disease has the highest research budget, Cancer or Dementia?
Cancer $77 Billion
Dementia: $203 Billion
There a medical directive cards that you have in your wallet, just in case you are in an accident and get taken to a medical facility. You might already have a medical directive card of for diabetes or blood transfusions, etc.
“The Advance Vaccine Directive is a valid Advance Health Directive or Living Will binding on the medical community under the law of Informed Consent. The Wallet Card our legal team developed is based on the latest US Supreme Court “I Do Not Consent” case, Missouri vs McNeely (2013). It covers circumstances in which you may find yourself facing not-consented vaccination, such as being brought into an ER unconscious and being subjected to immediate vaccination.”
The essential importance of asserting the Right Informed Consent to preserve it is shown by the 2013 US Supreme Court case of Missouri vs McNeely, where the warrantless extraction of blood was ruled illegal as the defendant “refused to consent.” Had McNeely remained silent, the blood test would have been allowed – http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/12pdf/11-1425_cb8e.pdf
Even “…diminished expectation of privacy does not diminish their privacy interest in preventing a government agent from piercing their skin. And though a blood test conducted in a medical setting by trained personnel is less intrusive than other bodily invasions, this Court has never retreated from its recognition that any compelled intrusion into the human body implicates significant, constitutionally protected privacy interests…” (page 15). – Ralph Fucetola JD
As you know hospitals today are vaccinating inbound patients. Protect yourself on admissions by presenting this card.
If you are pregnant, this is a must have ready on your admissions ….one for yourself and your emerging baby.
You might think that $25.00 is a high price to pay for a laminated card, but lots of legal research and efforts by Dr. Laibow and her foundation has gone into developing this strategy. And moreso, Dr. Laibow and her foundation has been a leading driver on the vaccine issue for decades, including international involvement. Give her the money:::))) and let her continue the activism that perhaps you don’t have time for. As Julian Assange said in his latest interview….transfer some of the money you make at your worldly occupation to those who are taking care of other issues that need the attention that you cannot give. (paraphrase)
C-SPAN video (from SEPTEMBER 8, 2015): WATCH THIS…INTERVIEW WITH JULIAN ASSANGE
Book Discussion on The Wikileaks Files
Julian Assange talked about his book, The WikiLeaks Files: The World According to US Empire, in which he lays out the information contained in the documents published to the WikiLeaks website in 2010. Mr. Assange spoke via video link from London: http://www.c-span.org/video/?328099-1/julian-assange-wikileaks-files
Detectable Mercury in the blood from chronic exposure
Dan Laks, lead author of the study “Assessment of chronic mercury exposure within the U.S. population, National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1999–2006)” analyzed data from the CDC’s National Health Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) and found that in the 1999-2000 NHANES survey, mercury was detected in the blood of 2 percent of women aged 18 to 49, that level rose to 30 percent of women by 2005-2006.
Assessment of chronic mercury exposure within the U.S. population, National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1999–2006