Orthodox Russian Philosopher Alexander Dugin & Islam Escalogical founder on ENDTIMES – ANTICHRIST

THE CRUCIFICATION AND THE RETURN OF JESUS
Ebook by Sheikh Imran JURUSALEM IN THE QUR’AN

EXCERPT FROM FORWARD:

Jerusalem in the Qur’an is a great book that thrilled and delighted me in a number

of ways. I am surprised that such a meticulously documented book had to wait for such

a long time before seeing the light. It is now more than half a century since the

Zionists began their appalling oppression and ethnic cleansing of the Palestinian

people whose only offense is that they happened to live in a country considered by the

Jews to be their promised holy land.

The Zionists have continuously referred to distorted scriptures from the Torah and

other Biblical material to justify their atrocious behavior.

Zionist Supremacism: An Ontological Definition

BY EILEEN DANNEMANN  (10/28/26)

Zionist supremacism, at its philosophical core, is an intensified experience of unity solely within a particular collective, accompanied by profound alienation from the underlying UNITY of humanity itself.

It is a form of collective identification in which extraordinary internal solidarity is elevated into claims of exclusive national, political, territorial, or divinely sanctioned entitlement, while the equal humanity and rights of those outside the collective are subordinated to its interests.

Collective identity hardens into an absolute reality, transforming what is fundamentally only one differentiated expression of humanity into a claim of supremacy over others.

The collective experiences extraordinary cohesion within its own boundaries while its ideological identification deliberately denies the humanity of those beyond them, who are, in essence, equally authentic expressions of the same indivisible Being. Moreover, once the collective is treated as an absolute, recognizing the equal humanity of outsiders feels like a threat to its own identity, compounding the isolation.

Historical suffering becomes enduring collective insecurity, so that preservation of group identity becomes an overriding imperative.

The spiritual error lies not in love of one’s people, cultural continuity, or the preservation of religious tradition, but in elevating a particular identity above the Universal Reality to which all humanity belongs.

From an ontological perspective, this is not genuine unity but a narrow, counterfeit unity sustained through rigid identification with separation.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.