Minnesota Dept. Of Health Hearing 6/2013: List of Formaldihyde in Vaccines
Leave a reply
Author Archives: Editor
Whistleblower: 29 year old Ed Snowden blows whistle on NSA surveillance
CDC “HPV” specious & bogus study caught by Michigan healthcare worker activist
Sharlene is a hospital healthcare worker in our network dealing with the forced vaccination of health professionals in Michigan. She caught this specious (emphasis added) study on the HPV vaccine and analyzed the authors’ flawed analysis and propaganda conclusion – authored by the CDC establishment to promote the HPV vaccine.
The CDC press release http://www.cdc.gov/
Sharlene’s article can be found here: http://www.theonc.org/
HPV Vaccine (Cervarix) – Chelsea’s Story: My Daughter and Cervarix: Suffering I Cannot Take Away
‘At one point or another, every parent in the world makes a decision they regret. Who could have predicted that an attempt to protect my daughter from cervical cancer via HPV vaccination would turn our lives into a constant battle to regain her health and maintain her right to an education? If we had only known……’‘At one point or another, every parent in the world makes a decision they regret. Who could have predicted that an attempt to protect my daughter from cervical cancer via HPV vaccination would turn our lives into a constant battle to regain her health and maintain her right to an education? If we had only known……’ Read Chelsea’s story…
TREASON: Constitution: Cannot be charges with treason unless the USA is in a declared war
Alan Philips, JD: Responding to establishment argument that “Parents Should Be Held Liable For The Deaths ‘Caused’ by Unvaccinated Children
Dr. Caplan’s primary premises, for purposes of the parental liability question, are essentially that: 1) Unvaccinated children put others at risk, 2) Unvaccinated children, as such, cause actual harm to others, and 3) Non-vaccinating parents know these first two premises, and should, therefore, be held liable for the harm caused by their failure to get their children vaccinated. I. The Real Ethical Issue
Dr. Caplan’s concern puts the cart before the horse. He has missed the target, a far more fundamental ethical question underlying his position, by mistakenly assuming that parents who refuse vaccines for their children are necessarily negligent for doing so. But the matter is not nearly so simple. Given the medically and legally established fact that vaccines cause permanent disability and death,[2] no parent can be reasonably categorized as “negligent” for choosing not to vaccinate their child. The real ethical question, then, is not whether or not parents should be held liable for their choice not to vaccinate, but instead, whether or not parents should be required to place their children at risk of vaccine injury or death in the first place. Read further…
Bradley Manning (Wikileaks) “I AM BRADLEY MANNING” WHISTLEBLOWER
BRADLEY MANNING STATEMENT …LEAKED:
TRANSCRIPT
PRIVATE MANNING’S TESTIMONY
HISTORY: Myron Fagan: 1910/1957/1965 Plot to destroy US Sovereignty.
In 1945, at the urgent request of John T. Flynn, the famous author of “The Roosevelt Myth,” While We Slept, “ “The True Story of Pearl Harbor”. Mr. Fagan attended a meeting in Washington, where he was shown a set of microfilms and recordings of the secret meetins at Yalta attended only by Franklin D. Roosevelt, Alger Hiss, Harry Hopkins, Stalin, Molotov and Vishinsky. They hatched a plot to deliver the Balkans, Eastern Europe and Berlin to Stalin.
3 YEAR OLD CHILD HEARS FOR THE FIRST TIME
New Law: Protesters Face 10 Years In Prison for Wearing Masks in Canada
A new Canadian bill turned law continues the international fight against protesters and the resistance movement by making it a crime punishable by up to 10 years in prison to wear a mask or any form of identity concealment during non-authorized gatherings. The law indicates that wearing a mask or concealing ones identity during any unlawful assembly, as described by Canadian law to be three or more people gathering to disturb the piece, the individual in question is committing a very serious crime. This new law is a companion to the preexisting “disguise with Intent” law, which was established to target those who go to a protest with intent to loot or riot and at the same time conceal their identity. This new law has a penalty of up to 10 years in prison, while the disguise with intent law only carries 5. READ MORE…