Today companies are developing 271 vaccines forinfectious diseases, cancer, neurological disorders, allergies and other diseases. Among the projects in development is a therapeutic vaccine for HIV infection intended to delay disease progression Read article
VLA comment: If we are already forced to get Hep B and in some states, HPV (gardasil) will we be forced some day to put the AIDS vaccine on the list of compulsory children’s vaccines for teens?
A recent article published in the British Medical Journal includes the following
“Despite the agency’s disclaimer, the CDC does receive millions of dollars in industry gifts and funding, both directly and indirectly, and several recent CDC actions and recommendations have raised questions about the science it cites, the clinical guidelines it promotes, and the money it is taking.”
Jeanne Lenzer, associate editor, The BMJ, USA Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: protecting the private good? BMJ 15 May 2015 Cite this as: BMJ 2015;350:h2362 ]
The Centers for Disease Control is a rogue institution engaged in the destruction of the health of the American population:
Excerpt:
Riveting book by David Lewis, Whistleblower scientistHow the US Government Uses Powerful Corporations and Leading Universities to Support Government Policies, Silence Top Scientists, Jeopardize Our Health, and Protect Corporate Profits
Listen to AUDIO: Dr. David Lewis, Whistleblower (30 years with EPA)
Excerpts from Audio: “Mass exodus of Scientists from EPA & CDC because of Julie Gerberding’s change of the nature of CDC from science to public relations/politics/marketing government policies. Employees claim Julie Gerberding threatens public health. Science is now politically controlled”..
Dr. Lewis’ book: SCIENCE FOR SALE (BUY)
Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Michael Leavitt addresses members of the American Legislative Exchange Council Thursday, July 29, 2004, in Seattle. Behind Leavitt is a sign for the morning’s sponsor, ExxonMobil. (AP Photo/Elaine Thompson)
ALEC prepares model bills to run through the nation state capitols based on government intention and corporate interest. Legislators from all over the nation are members of ALEC.
This is how a tsunami of bills suddenly shows up in states across the nation. BILL GATES FOUNDATION & ALEC: This is what I just found. I would think now Gates Foundation would get another associate organization of theirs to support ALEX.
In November 2011, the Gates Foundation made a $376,635 grant to the American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC), which it claims was “to educate and engage its membership on more efficient state budget approaches to drive greater student outcomes, as well as educate them on beneficial ways to recruit, retain, evaluate and compensate effective teaching based upon merit and achievement.”[3] In April 2012, during a public campaign by public interest groups targeting ALEC supporters and urging them to cut ties with ALEC, during which the Progressive Change Campaign Committee (PCCC) specifically targeted the foundation, Gates spokesman Chris Williams told the Capitol Hill publication Roll Call, that it does not plan to make future grants to the conservative nonprofit and specifically noted that the foundation was never a dues-paying member of ALEC.[4] Williams also told BuzzFeed that the foundation does not plan to withdraw that grant “for now. . . . We have already paid out a significant portion of it,” he said.[5]
In Iowa for example, a majority of Republicans a members of ALEC.
Watch this video: MUST WATCH EYE OPENING!!!!
An Atlanta TV station just aired one of the best takedowns of the secretive nature of ALEC we’ve ever seen: May 22, 2015
Of the 21 entities testifying in opposition to LD 1076
On whether or not they knew about or understood the VICP:
9 gave testimony that showed that they didn’t understand the VICP (4 Medical Professionals Organizations, 3 Public Health Agencies, 2 Health Care Corporations)
11 gave testimony that was unclear on whether they understood the VICP or not (3 Pediatricians, 2 Medical Professional Organizations, 1 Health Care Corporation, 2 parents and 3 advocates.
1 Gave testimony that showed that she knew about the VICP, but that she believed that it “provides a swift, comprehensive alternative to litigation.” (Pediatrician representing a Health Care Corporation)
On whether or not they could differentiate VICP from VAERS:
8 confused VICP with VAERS (4 Medical Professional Organizations, 3 Public Health Agencies,and 1 Health Care Corporation.
12 did not give enough information to tell if they were confusing VICP with VAERS (1 Medical Professional Organizations, 3 Pediatricians, 3 Advocates, 2 parents and a Health Care Corporations
1 could differentiate between VICP and VAERS (Pediatrician representing a Health Care Corporation)
On their reasons for opposing the bill:
9 stated only that they were opposed to the bill, and gave no explanation as to why (3 Pediatricians, 1 Medical Professional Organization, 1 Health Care Corporation, 2 Advocates and 2 parents.)
8 reported that it was redundant to federal legislation (3 Medical Professional Organizations, 3 Public Health Officials, 2 Health Care Corporations) READ MORE…
Under the terms of the coalition deal, which appointed party member Yaakov Litzman deputy health minister, “the National Insurance law will be amended, such that child allowances will not be given in cases where a parent refuses to vaccinate their child.”
Tesla Howitzers.” They can deliver a giant blast of energy to the distant target site, true “action-at-a-distance”.
The Tesla Howitzer and its modes of action
Source: Tom Bearden’s weapons slides and Fer-de-Lance Briefing
For one thing there is no delivery of any thing to any place.
Bombs are obsolete.
So are the planes to get them there.
No helicopters necessary.
All current nuclear devices are rendered nearly useless by electronic “dudding.”
All distant-destruction can be done from a control room, and to any point on earth.
The destructive power of “men” has just increased by orders of magnitude.
The new weapons could even cause storms on the sun!
Thus there is great urgency to make these new facts public and known, with the hope that all nations would come together to ban the use of scalar weapons. READ MORE…
In summary: 1) due to the properties of modern vaccines, non-vaccinated individuals pose no greater risk of transmission of polio, diphtheria, pertussis, and numerous non-type b H. influenzae strains than vaccinated individuals do, non-vaccinated individuals pose virtually no danger of transmission of hepatitis B in a school setting, and tetanus is not transmissible at all; 2) there is a significantly elevated risk of emergency room visits after childhood vaccination appointments attesting that vaccination is not risk-free; 3) outbreaks of measles cannot be entirely prevented even if we had nearly perfect vaccination compliance; and 4) an effective method of preventing measles and other viral diseases in vaccine-ineligible infants and the immunocompromised, immunoglobulin, is available for those who may be exposed to these diseases.
Taken together, these four facts make it clear that discrimination in a public school setting against children who are not vaccinated for reasons of conscience is completely unwarranted as the vaccine status of conscientious objectors poses no undue public health risk. Read letter from Dr. Obukhanych, PHD, Immunology
SOTN Editor note: When the California Senate refuses to consider authoritative scientific evidence which categorically proves the dangerous vaccine side effects on the schoolchildren, something is very wrong. Such conduct by the Senate constitutes criminal action that endangers the lives and welfare of children. Their official behavior must be acknowledged for what it is — CRIMINAL — and prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law.