7 thoughts on “Gardasil: Dr. Russell Blaylock (Bachman vs. Perry)

  1. Kathy Cummings

    How do we trust an organization like CDC which claimed there was no madcow disease in the US, when Milk Outrage Organization, aka “MOO” found out it was because they were not keeping records on it?

  2. Dr. Michael

    Vaccines attack the immune system, they do not confer immunization. If you think you can trust the Big Pharma vaccine makers, you are making a life threatening mistake!!

  3. Mindanoiha

    The promotion of this vaccine is nothing short of criminality. It has not been shown to prevent one single case of cervical cancer. It has been shown to cause far more adverse effects than other vaccines. Long term side effects are unknown. It increases the risk of brain damage. It causes seizures. It causes outbreak of genital and facial warts. It probably increases the risk of blood clots. It possibly increases risk of miscarriage or babies born with anomalies. Seven out of ten get a new illness after taking the vaccine. If it is taken when HPV is already present it increases the risk of cancer by over 44%. It increases the risk of positive PAP smears. It is not tested to see if it causes cancer. It may also cause cancer through replacement (new virus strains which replace the ones removed may be more cancer causing). It may cause cancer due to the presence of recombinant (gene manipulated) DNA. Other consequences due to the presence of this DNA are unknown and may be horrific.

  4. Erwin Alber

    Thanks for the informative video!

    As far as I am concerned, Dr Russell Blaylock is a beacon of light in this age dominated by corporate corruption and junk science.

    I have yet to see any evidence that shows that vaccines have ever prevented anything, apart from health, sanity and common sense. As far as I am concerned, vaccination is an organised criminal enterprise dressed up as disease prevention by means of pseudoscience.

  5. Margaret Kuebler

    Since 1986, the U.S. government has been financially responsible for the compensation of all vacine-related injuries. What are the odds that any scientist working for Big Pharma ever will appear in the national media to discuss the inherent dangers in his or her drug company’s products? Why, then, would anyone expect a government paid scientist (from either the CDC or NIH) ever to appear in the national media and admit that FDA-approved vaccines pose serious risks? The conflict of interest here is too extreme for any American citizen to bear. How may any of us trust the integrity of any CDC or NIH scientist on the topic of vaccines when his or her employer is on the hook to pay for the injuries which they cause. Of course, the U.S. government will fail to acknowledge as many injuries caused by vaccines as is possible and most likely will threaten to fire any government scientist who publicly speaks out on all the risks attendant to vaccines of which s/he is aware. This is a no-brainer.

  6. Allison

    30 years ago my well 7 mo. old daughter was vaccinated and she immediately had a fever (of 105 degrees) that caused her to be mentally handcapped. It changed our lives forever. I was worried that she would have pain from the shot not knowing of any danger.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.