Monthly Archives: July 2012

KXYL.com IDAHO NEWS BROADCAST: VACCINES CAUSES SIDS

This is a very good broadcast that doesn’t dance to the CDC beat.
“In 1975, when Japan stopped vaccinating children under the age of 2 years dramatic improvements in their infant mortality occurred. Japan’s place in the world scale of infant mortality went from 17, a poor position, to number 1, the best performance. It is quite clear that the shift of the lower vaccination limit to 2 years resulted in a dramatic decrease in SIDS going quickly from a very high to the lowest rate of infant deaths in the world. Between 1970 and 1974, 37 infant deaths occurred after DPT vaccination in Japan and because of this the doctors in one prefecture boycotted the vaccination. Consequently, the Japanese Government stopped DPT vaccination for 2 months in 1975, and, when vaccination was resumed, the vaccination age was lifted to 2 years.

With this change in government policy the entity of sudden death almost disappeared from vaccine injury compensation claims (only 2 deaths were subject of vaccine injury compensation claims in the 2-year olds compared with 37 in younger children).
In the late ‘80s, Japanese parents were given the choice to start vaccinating at earlier ages again and most, ignorant of what had gone on before, chose starting at 3 months of age. The rate of SIDS in Japan has since returned to high levels.” See: Dr. Viera Scheibner’s book “Vaccination, a medical assault on the immune system, pp. 46, 49, 78:

There is a crude graph of infant and child mortality in Japan from 1960-1990. The drop that followed the temporary stop in vaccination and raising the age of vaccination to 2 years is evident. The figures are taken from a Berkeley University web page. The graph can be accessed here:The decline in vaccination in under age 2 children began prior to 1975.

KXYL.com IDAHO NEWS BROADCAST: VACCINES CAUSES SIDS

This is a very good broadcast that doesn’t dance to the CDC beat.
“In 1975, when Japan stopped vaccinating children under the age of 2 years dramatic improvements in their infant mortality occurred. Japan’s place in the world scale of infant mortality went from 17, a poor position, to number 1, the best performance. It is quite clear that the shift of the lower vaccination limit to 2 years resulted in a dramatic decrease in SIDS going quickly from a very high to the lowest rate of infant deaths in the world. Between 1970 and 1974, 37 infant deaths occurred after DPT vaccination in Japan and because of this the doctors in one prefecture boycotted the vaccination. Consequently, the Japanese Government stopped DPT vaccination for 2 months in 1975, and, when vaccination was resumed, the vaccination age was lifted to 2 years.

With this change in government policy the entity of sudden death almost disappeared from vaccine injury compensation claims (only 2 deaths were subject of vaccine injury compensation claims in the 2-year olds compared with 37 in younger children).
In the late ‘80s, Japanese parents were given the choice to start vaccinating at earlier ages again and most, ignorant of what had gone on before, chose starting at 3 months of age. The rate of SIDS in Japan has since returned to high levels.” See: Dr. Viera Scheibner’s book “Vaccination, a medical assault on the immune system, pp. 46, 49, 78:

There is a crude graph of infant and child mortality in Japan from 1960-1990. The drop that followed the temporary stop in vaccination and raising the age of vaccination to 2 years is evident. The figures are taken from a Berkeley University web page. The graph can be accessed here:The decline in vaccination in under age 2 children began prior to 1975.

Dr. Becker: A Sad Lesson in Why We Should Never View Vaccines as Harmless

In a very sad story out of Colorado Springs, CO, a much loved family cat is dying of a type of cancer called vaccine-associated sarcoma (VAS).

The kitty, named Hozart, has a large, open tumor on his back near his tail, which is exactly the spot where three “routine” vaccines were injected years ago.

The vaccinations Hozart received were for distemper, the feline leukemia virus, and rabies. Two of the three, the rabies and feline leukemia (FeLV) vaccines, are most commonly associated with injection site tumors in cats.  Read more…

Dr. Becker: A Sad Lesson in Why We Should Never View Vaccines as Harmless

In a very sad story out of Colorado Springs, CO, a much loved family cat is dying of a type of cancer called vaccine-associated sarcoma (VAS).

The kitty, named Hozart, has a large, open tumor on his back near his tail, which is exactly the spot where three “routine” vaccines were injected years ago.

The vaccinations Hozart received were for distemper, the feline leukemia virus, and rabies. Two of the three, the rabies and feline leukemia (FeLV) vaccines, are most commonly associated with injection site tumors in cats.  Read more…

Dr. Paul G. King: Analysis of alternative vaccine schedule

Vaccine effectiveness generally varies from significantly less than 60 % to no greater than 95 %. However, in many instances, there is no proof that even those who are “fully vaccinated” are truly protected from subsequently contracting the claimed strain or strains of a disease or diseases, when the person inoculated is, at some future date, exposed to whatever strain or strains of that disease or those diseases for which some level of protection is claimed.

Therefore, the greatest harms that a parents’ alternative inoculation schedule probably will cause in the USA are:

a. The loss of revenue to the vaccine makers and, from the tax on vaccines, the US government, and b. The loss of income to those administering the vaccines.

In addition, absent exposure to the disease in a manner that triggers a clinical case of the disease, there is no inherent risk of harm to those children who are not inoculated with the vaccine against that disease.

Therefore, parents should limit their newborns’ exposure to others, especially those who are ill and, to the extent possible, minimize the infants’ exposures to public venues until their newborns are at least one year of age.  Read more…

Dr.Paul G. King: Address to the World Health Org. (WHO) Why No Thimerosal!

Excerpt:  First, this reviewer must congratulate Dr. Pichichero, the author of this “Opinion” piece, for his adroit use of the English language to create a title that conceals the reality of the on-going concerns about the safety of Thimerosal by stating (emphasis added), “No New Concerns About Thimerosal”, because the concerns about Thimerosal that the he proceeds to discuss have not only existed since the 1930s but also have been misaddressed by studies that did not or cannot prove the “safety” of Thimerosal.  Read argument…