Category Archives: Government experimentation on the public

Medical Directive (vaccine) Card for your wallet

Leave a reply

There a medical directive cards that you have in your wallet, just in case you are in an accident and get taken to a medical facility. You might already have a medical directive card of for diabetes or blood transfusions, etc.

“The Advance Vaccine Directive is a valid Advance Health Directive or Living Will binding on the medical community under the law of Informed Consent. The Wallet Card our legal team developed is based on the latest US Supreme Court “I Do Not Consent” case, Missouri vs McNeely (2013). It covers circumstances in which you may find yourself facing not-consented vaccination, such as being brought into an ER unconscious and being subjected to immediate vaccination.”
.
The essential importance of asserting the Right Informed Consent to preserve it is shown by the 2013 US Supreme Court case of Missouri vs McNeely, where the warrantless extraction of blood was ruled illegal as the defendant “refused to consent.” Had McNeely remained silent, the blood test would have been allowed – http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/12pdf/11-1425_cb8e.pdf
.
Even “…diminished expectation of privacy does not diminish their privacy interest in preventing a government agent from piercing their skin. And though a blood test conducted in a medical setting by trained personnel is less intrusive than other bodily invasions, this Court has never retreated from its recognition that any compelled intrusion into the human body implicates significant, constitutionally protected privacy interests…” (page 15). – Ralph Fucetola JD

VLA comment:

As you know hospitals today are vaccinating inbound patients. Protect yourself on admissions by presenting this card.

If you are pregnant, this is a must have ready on your admissions ….one for yourself and your emerging baby.

You might think that $25.00 is a high price to pay for a laminated card, but lots of legal research and efforts by Dr. Laibow and her foundation has gone into developing this strategy. And moreso, Dr. Laibow and her foundation has been a leading driver on the vaccine issue for decades, including international involvement. Give her the money:::))) and let her continue the activism that perhaps you don’t have time for. As Julian Assange said in his latest interview….transfer some of the money you make at your worldly occupation to those who are taking care of other issues that need the attention that you cannot give. (paraphrase)

DETAILS and Buy

Another first in the nation: Govt. vaccine mandate to private industry (California legislators pass SB792)

3 Replies

landry-paul

California legislators pass SB792

This bill, commencing September 1, 2016, would prohibit a person from being employed or volunteering at a day care center or a family day care home if he or she has not been immunized against influenza, pertussis, and measles.

Thursday, Sept. 12, 2015 the California legislator passed another first in the nation bill, SB 792.  It is a very dangerous precedent.  It is the first in the nation that a government mandates vaccination to private industry. With this we may see a future of the government mandating vaccine compliance to one industry at at time, as a means to achieve National Institute of Health goals of Compulsory Adult Vaccination. This follows on the heels of SB 277 which has been signed into law.  SB277 prohibits a child to attend private, public or pre school without being fully vaccinated (at this time….49 vaccine doses by the age of six).  Unvaccinated children must homeschool.  Homeschool can not be a classroom setting. It is notable that Bill Gates, the number one promoter of world wide vaccination also is in the homeschool business  (virtual education).  He has bought up many home school programs and has changed programs to integrate Federally developed education for the masses…Common Core Curricuum.

Vaccinating the Health-Care Workforce: State Law vs. Institutional Requirements

1 Reply

nurses-refuse-vaccines-702x336

Vaccinating the Health-Care Workforce: State Law vs. Institutional Requirements (READ)

Excerpts

At the state level, the legal authority to require immunization rests on states’ 10th Amendment “police powers,” which can be used to effectively convert public health recommendations into legally enforceable obligations. States can exercise this power directly or delegate their powers to local governments.

Of equally great importance is the role of the federal government. It is the case that the direct regulation of the public’s health is a traditional state function under the 10th Amendment. At the same time, the federal government has enormous powers under the Commerce Clause and the Spending Clause to both attach conditions of participation to federally funded programs as well as to regulate economic activity,31 of which health care is viewed as a preeminent example. To this end, federal conditions of participation for the Medicare and Medicaid programs, which currently do not address the immunization status of the health-care workforce, offer another potential basis for establishing minimum safeguards against the transmission of disease in health-care settings, in particular settings in which sick patients reside, such as nursing homes and hospitals.

MANDATORY VACCINATION

Some facilities have instituted mandatory employee influenza vaccination programs,9 and one state (NY) has promulgated regulations making seasonal and H1N1 influenza vaccination mandatory.10 However this is being challenged.

VLA comment:  Thursday, Sept. 12, 2015 the California legislator passed another first in the nation bill, SB 792.  It is a very dangerous precedent.  It is the first in the nation that government mandates vaccination to private industry. This follows on the heels of SB 277 which has been signed into law.  SB277 prohibits a child to attend private, public or pre school without being fully vaccinated (at this time….49 vaccine doses by the age of six).  Unvaccinated children must homeschool.  Homeschool can not be a classroom setting.

Oakland, California School District-Will they DEFY SB277 law

Leave a reply

SB277 (California) has been passed and signed by the governor. No child is allowed to go to school, public, private or pre school without being fully vaccinated (49 vaccine doses by the age of six). All unvaccinated children must homeschool.

The Nation of Islam taking on the Oakland School district which hosts the most black students of any district except Los Angeles.

Oct. 7, 2015 UPDATE:  SB792 is another California bill if signed by the Governor will be the first in the nation to mandate compulsory ADULT vaccinations.

We sent this letter and 7 books of Dissolving Illusions to the Oakland School Board (Oct 7th).

DEFY UNJUST LAWS!

Oakland letter

 

NY Introduces bill to ban all vaccine exemptions except limited medical

1 Reply

a - Jeffrey Dinowitz_0

Bill TEXT

Bill would end religious exemption for vaccines

A state assemblyman has introduced a bill to toughen New York’s vaccination law by eliminating religious exemptions for parents seeking to enroll their children in school, setting up a debate within his own party over whether the government should challenge the sincerity of a religious conviction.

Assemblyman Jeffrey Dinowitz, a Democrat from the Bronx, said he doesn’t believe the vast majority of parents taking advantage of religious exemptions are truly devout.

Instead, he said, “they have bought into the garbage that these vaccinations can cause autism. That’s a lot of crap.”

Congressman Bill Posey: CDC under investigation for Fraud

Leave a reply

Excerpts from transcribed video from Dr. Thompson, whistleblower CDC below:

“…the adjusted race-effect, statistical significance was HUGE. All the authors and I met and decided sometime between August and September ’02 not to report any race effects for the paper. Sometime soon after the meeting we decided to exclude reporting any race effects, the co-authors scheduled a meeting to destroy documents related to the study. The remaining four co-authors all met and brought a big garbage can into the meeting room and reviewed and went through all the hard copy documents that we had thought we should discard and put them in a huge garbage can. However, because I assumed it was illegal and would violate both FOIA and DOJ requests, I kept hard copies of all documents in my office, and I retained all associated computer files. I believe we intentionally withheld controversial findings from the final draft of the Pediatrics paper. (End of quote of the doctor [William Thompson]).