In 2002, 1 in 125 young children had peanut allergy in the US. 2008 one in every 17 children under the age of 3 has food allergy. “…when we arrived at the ER and I announced that my son had eaten peanut butter I could not fathom the response of the nurses. They leapt across desks, caps flying, yelling, wheeling, snatching up the boy, jabbing his little arm with needles, stabbing an IV into the back of his hand. Screaming now with fear and confusion, he was strapped down so he couldn’t move, pumped with drugs, hooked to monitors and drips. I stood behind the team of four or six or there might have been 10 doctors and nurses, whatever the exact number it seemed totally out of proportion to my announcement that we had just eaten peanut butter. How could a food I had eaten for years cause such a reaction? “At this point, at last, I started to think. What was going on? This allergy had developed in hundreds of thousands of children, not just mine – it had grown from an infrequent occurrence in 1990 to 1.5% of the US population, 4.5 million people by 2009. Neither coincidence nor genetic fluke could explain these numbers.
The CDC has boldly denied that there is any evidence supporting a causal link between vaccines and infant death, despite the fact that their own webpage on the topic acknowledges that “From 2 to 4 months old, babies begin their primary course of vaccinations. This is also the peak age for sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS).” Written off as coincidence, the CDC suggests that stomach sleeping is the primary modifiable risk factor.
Because SIDS is the 3rd leading cause of death in infants, and because the U.S. has one of the highest infant mortality rates in the developed world, one would think that more progress would have been made toward understanding its causes. Perhaps, as explored in this past article, the signal of harm is being ignored. Neglect and suppression of available data has recently been exposed with the confession of a top CDC vaccine scientist who was compelled to covered up data revealing an autism-MMR link in African-American boys.
– See more at: http://www.greenmedinfo.com/blog/cdcs-own-data-vaccine-infant-death-link?ct=t(5_Sure_Fire_Ways_to_Beat_the_Flu10_10_2015)#sthash.EGSnsz8E.dpuf
Does anyone wonder why these mass shootings are occurring in these last decades, usually perpetrated by young men? And the suicides! Have you noticed that suicides have become an epidemic in soldiers, adults in general and even children as young as seven?
A tsunami of vaccine bills flooded
the legislatures of 36 states in the
nation this year. Clearly, this orchestrated
wave of vaccine bills emanates
from an initiative driven by national
and international forces. Read more..Vaccines Acres USA October15_Opinion
There a medical directive cards that you have in your wallet, just in case you are in an accident and get taken to a medical facility. You might already have a medical directive card of for diabetes or blood transfusions, etc.
“The Advance Vaccine Directive is a valid Advance Health Directive or Living Will binding on the medical community under the law of Informed Consent. The Wallet Card our legal team developed is based on the latest US Supreme Court “I Do Not Consent” case, Missouri vs McNeely (2013). It covers circumstances in which you may find yourself facing not-consented vaccination, such as being brought into an ER unconscious and being subjected to immediate vaccination.”
.
The essential importance of asserting the Right Informed Consent to preserve it is shown by the 2013 US Supreme Court case of Missouri vs McNeely, where the warrantless extraction of blood was ruled illegal as the defendant “refused to consent.” Had McNeely remained silent, the blood test would have been allowed – http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/12pdf/11-1425_cb8e.pdf
.
Even “…diminished expectation of privacy does not diminish their privacy interest in preventing a government agent from piercing their skin. And though a blood test conducted in a medical setting by trained personnel is less intrusive than other bodily invasions, this Court has never retreated from its recognition that any compelled intrusion into the human body implicates significant, constitutionally protected privacy interests…” (page 15). – Ralph Fucetola JD
VLA comment:
As you know hospitals today are vaccinating inbound patients. Protect yourself on admissions by presenting this card.
If you are pregnant, this is a must have ready on your admissions ….one for yourself and your emerging baby.
You might think that $25.00 is a high price to pay for a laminated card, but lots of legal research and efforts by Dr. Laibow and her foundation has gone into developing this strategy. And moreso, Dr. Laibow and her foundation has been a leading driver on the vaccine issue for decades, including international involvement. Give her the money:::))) and let her continue the activism that perhaps you don’t have time for. As Julian Assange said in his latest interview….transfer some of the money you make at your worldly occupation to those who are taking care of other issues that need the attention that you cannot give. (paraphrase)
A darling two-year-old, curly head Worcester, Massachusetts, toddler girl, Gigi, was found dead by her little brother in the morning after her mother had put her to bed, apparently well, the night before.
In the Channel 7 Worcester, Massachusetts, news clip, distraught relatives tell how lively the child was, and that 2 days prior, Gigi had vaccinations.
When ordering from New Atlantean Press (the publisher), you can get a 40% to 50% discount: http://vacbook.com/mro.htm The options are available on the website or by calling 505-983-1856.
Have DDT and Polio Vaccines been Used for Population Control?
Lies, Lies and More Lies
In 2012, Neetu Vashisht and Jacob Puliye published a paper in the Indian Journal of Medical Ethics titled Polio programme: let us declare victory and move on. Throughout their paper, they make it abundantly clear that polio is here to stay and that cases of vaccine-induced polio are reaching an all-time high. They wrote:
“It was hoped that following polio eradication, immunisation could be stopped. However the synthesis of polio virus in 2002, made eradication impossible. It is argued that getting poor countries to expend their scarce resources on an impossible dream over the last 10 years was unethical.
Furthermore, while India has been polio-free for a year, there has been a huge increase in non-polio acute flaccid paralysis (NPAFP). In 2011, there were an extra 47,500 new cases of NPAFP. Clinically indistinguishable from polio paralysis but twice as deadly, the incidence of NPAFP was directly proportional to doses of oral polio received. Though this data was collected within the polio surveillance system, it was not investigated. The principle of primum-non-nocere was violated.”