Pfizer Vice President Dr. Peter Rost blows the whistle on ‘deadly’ vaccines.
According to the Gardasil 9 package insert, 1,028 women who were injected with Gardasil 9 became pregnant during the course of the clinical trials along with 991 women who had been injected with Gardasil. Overall, 14.1% of the Gardasil 9 women suffered adverse outcomes while 17.0% of the Gardasil women suffered the same fate. A total of 313 women either lost their babies to spontaneous abortion or late fetal death or gave birth to children with congenital anomalies. READ MORE…
|225 mcg||AAHS (aluminum adjuvant)||500 mcg|
|9.56 mcg||Sodium Chloride||9.56 mcg|
|.78 mcg||L-Histidine||.78 mcg|
|50 mcg||Polysorbate 80||50 mcg|
|35 mcg||Sodium Borate||35 mcg|
|<7 mcg||Yeast Protein||<7 mcg|
|20 mcg||HPV 6 L1 protein||30 mcg|
|40 mcg||HPV 11 L1 protein||40 mcg|
|40 mcg||HPV 16 L1 protein||60 mcg|
|20 mcg||HPV 18 L1 protein||40 mcg|
|HPV 31 L1 protein||20 mcg|
|HPV 33 L1 protein||20 mcg|
|HPV 45 L1 protein||20 mcg|
|HPV 52 L1 protein||20 mcg|
|HPV 58 L1 protein||20 mcg|
Zostavax uses a weakened form of the herpes zoster virus—commonly referred to as shingles—in order to activate the immune system
Plaintiffs allege that Zostavax caused even more serious complications, like blindness, hearing loss, paralysis, brain damage, and fatal liver failure.
Merck is currently battling another lawsuit for its mumps, measles, and rubella (MMR) vaccine. In 2010, two former Merck scientists accused the company of manipulating clinical test results to maintain its U.S. monopoly on the MMR vaccine. The court documents allege that Merck noticed in the late 1990s that the vaccine was falling below the 95 percent efficiency requirement necessary to sell the vaccine. Instead of improving the vaccine, Merck allegedly tinkered with the clinical trial results—which the two whistleblowers say they were asked to help carry out.
Many pharmaceutical companies are protected under the 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act, which requires that patients file injury claims with the federal government. However, Zostavax is not listed in the act’s injury table, allowing injured patients to file lawsuits in court.
Since the creation of the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, injured patients have received $3.6 billion. READ MORE…
This article critically reviews HPV vaccine serious adverse events described in pre-licensure randomized trials and in post-marketing case series. HPV vaccine randomized trials were identified in PubMed. Safety data were extracted. Post-marketing case series describing HPV immunization adverse events were reviewed. Most HPV vaccine randomized trials did not use inert placebo in the control group. Two of the largest randomized trials found significantly more severe adverse events in the tested HPV vaccine arm of the study.
(9/2017)Guyana to Vaccinate Thousands of Girls with HPV vaccine
(10/2017) Jamaica urged to hold off on HPV vaccine
A number of safety signals—complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS), postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS), and chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS)—have emerged with human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccines, which share a similar pattern of symptomatology. Previous signal evaluations and epidemiological studies have largely relied on traditional methodologies and signals have been considered individually.
The aim of this study was to explore global reporting patterns for HPV vaccine for subgroups of reports with similar adverse event (AE) profiles. READ MORE…
We are writing to share our concerns about the HPV vaccination campaign that the Guyana Ministry of Public Health has once again re-launched, specifically targeting pre-teen schoolgirls.
NOTE: LISTED IN THIS LETTER ARE ome specific concerns about HPV and Gardasil that we urge you to review and share, especially with parents of pre-teen and teenage girl children, so that all may become better informed and more able to make a good decision about safeguarding the health of their children. Do note that all this data is from highly reputable, scientifically accurate sources (references are included so that you may check for yourself). READ MORE…
This ABSTRACT ABOVE critically reviews HPV vaccine serious adverse events described in pre-licensure randomized trials and in post-marketing case series. HPV vaccine randomized trials were identified in PubMed. Safety data were extracted. Post-marketing case series describing HPV immunization adverse events were reviewed. Most HPV vaccine randomized trials did not use inert placebo in the control group. Two of the largest randomized trials found significantly more severe adverse events in the tested HPV vaccine arm of the study. READ STUDY…
VLA COMMENT: DO YOU BELIEVE THIS? Compared to 2871 women receiving aluminum placebo!!!
The panel consensus is that virtually all youngsters receive the HPV vaccine. The CDC and American Cancer Society say that there will be 12,000 cervical cancers diagnosed in the United States each year, among a population of 170 million women. The chances of my daughter being diagnosed in any given year are 12,000 out of 170 million, which works out to .007 percent. The odds of her not being diagnosed in any given year, by the same math, is 99.9929 percent.
Accordingly, the blanket claim that the vaccine has no serious adverse effects should be carefully revisited.ed 10 years later, were actually more likely to be infected with high risk, low risk, and all strains of HPV. The four vaccine strains were reduced- but other, possibly more pathogenic, HPV viruses moved in to fill the void.
The American Center for Cancer Research reported in 2015 that girls who received the four strain HPV shot, when assessA VAERS review of HPV vaccine reports shows
VLA Comment: It is well known that the VAERS reporting is at a 1% level. Dr. Paul G. King discovered in his research on the flu vaccine concerning a CDC spontaneous abortion study that reported that there were approx. 900 fetal demise reported by Kaiser Permanente covering only the Northern California area. Dr. King compared that to the VAERS reporting which is required by law that the physicians report the associated vaccine adverse reaction. He found no reports to VAERS for the same time period. Can one conclude that if there were 900 reports (in No. California alone) that was not reported to VAERS that the 54,105 adverse reaction reports to VAERS are greatly underestimated?