In February, 2015, Justin Trudeau has called on the prime minister to use government advertising to promote the “life-saving benefits” of vaccines, and accused Conservatives of cutting funding to vaccination education since coming to power. READ MORE…
WATCH for free
Excerpts from NY Times movie review
“Inside Job,” Charles Ferguson’s meticulous and infuriating documentary about the causes and consequences of the financial crisis of 2008,]. Dozens of interviews — along with news clips and arresting aerial shots of New York, Iceland and other disaster areas — are folded into a clear and absorbing history, narrated by Matt Damon. The music (an opening song, “Big Time,” by Peter Gabriel, and a score by Alex Heffes) and the clean wide-screen cinematography provide an aesthetic polish that is welcome for its own sake and also important to the movie’s themes. The handsomely lighted and appointed interiors convey a sense of the rarefied, privileged worlds in which the Wall Street operators and their political enablers flourished, and the elegance of the presentation also subliminally bolsters the film’s authority. This is not a piece of ragged muckraking or breathless advocacy. It rests its outrage on reason, research and careful argument.
The Democratic governor announced Sunday that he approved a bill requiring day care centers and day care homes to maintain immunization records proving their workers and volunteers have been vaccinated for the flu, pertussis and the measles.
VLA Warning: “This is a first in the nation bill that gives power to the state to mandate vaccines for adults. This is just the beginning of compulsory adult vaccinations as well as a precedent setting law for forced medical treatments such as psyche drug implants for the supposed mentally ill; forced chemotherapy for children against the parents will and whatever the medical mafia decides what is profitable”.
–Eileen Dannemann, founder www.VaccineLiberationArmy.com
Powerpoint presentation (5 minutes)
https://vaccineliberationarmy.com/?s=humanity666
Brown signed the “End of Life Act” into law on Monday, and in doing so California joins four other states — Oregon, Washington, Vermont and Montana — where patients’ right to choose doctor-assisted death is protected either by law or court order. Read more…
A great find…
The ruling and the argument:
Take for example this: Justice Harlan stated “There is, of course, a sphere within which the individual may assert the supremacy of his own will and rightfully dispute the authority of any human government, especially of any free government existing under a written constitution. But it is equally true that in every well-ordered society charged with the duty of conserving the safety of its members the rights of the individual in respect of his liberty may at times, under the pressure of great dangers, be subjected to such restraint, to be enforced by reasonable regulations, as the safety of the general public may demand.2(p29)” Read more…
This is interesting also: “…the Court said that it was the legislature’s prerogative to determine how to control the epidemic, as long as it did not act in an unreasonable, arbitrary or oppressive manner.2,39,40 Vaccination was a reasonable means of control: “The state legislature proceeded upon the theory which recognized vaccination as at least an effective if not the best known way in which to meet and suppress the evils of a smallpox epidemic that imperiled an entire population.”2(p31)”
VLA Comment: The above ruling was meant to support the State’s position. But if we look at it as applying to both sides the question that this discussion raises regarding SB 277 & SB 792 is were we under the pressure of great dangers? Additionally, “Effective”Court ruling recognized that the vaccine needs “to be at least – effective”. The CDC admits the flu shot is not effective. We have prove that the vaccines are not effective by admission of the CDC (flu shot, ie.) and the fact that a percentage of the participants in both the measles and the whooping couph outbreak were fully vaccinated individuals.
Secondly: “legislature proceeded upon the theory which recognized vaccination as at least an effective if not the best known way in which to meet and suppress the evils…that imperiled an entire generation” Was the entire generation “imperiled”?. Can the vaccines which are ineffective meet and supress that which is evil. Is the measles virus evil when studies have shown that getting the early childhood measles protects against cancer. Moreover biotechnologist are genetically engineering the natural measles because they have discovered that getting the natural measles virus may cure cancer.
Perhaps we might argue that the theory of which the California legislators proceeded upon is faulty… that vaccines are effective. This theory is challenged by independent, non industry related scientists, researchers and doctors. If challenged the court would have to consider the current pro and con studies and science materials to see if the “theory” that the legislators followed is sound or questionable. We have the opportunity to submit our science.
California SB792 law
Re: SB 792: Let’s be clear what our soundbite concept should be: What we should be pointing out to the Governor is that SB 792 is A FIRST IN THE NATION BILL….A BILL IF PASSED INTO LAW, GIVES THE POWER TO THE STATE, the Government, TO MANDATE MEDICAL TREATMENTS, in this case namely vaccines. This is a law that sets precedence. It is the foundation bill/law to facilitate, in the future, other medical treatments….such as forced mental health drug implants, forced chemotherapy, lobotomies, etc.
Amidst hysteria arising from a relatively small number of cases of measles (some 600 last year and some 150 this year), law makers would take away everyone’s rights to liberty and personal autonomy.
Given the likelihood that at least some of these draconian measures will pass, it is wise to reflect upon our history to see from whence this peculiar deviation from ordinary protection for liberty rights comes. It is also wise to appreciate that the law favoring compulsory vaccination is now scientifically anachronistic and that modern understanding of immunology enables us to employ measures that reduce the risk of disease carriage and transmission without forcibly tying down children and adults and injecting them with substances they do not wish to have in their bodies.
It will surprise many to learn that the concept of compulsory vaccination has national socialist roots in our country that spring from the same drive for a “master race” that led the Nazis to embrace eugenics (including forced sterilization) and dysgenics (including execution of the Jews and others deemed “undesirable”). It will surprise many to learn that the person most responsible for eliminating constitutional protections against such intrusions (the Fourteenth Amendment) is one regarded as among America’s greatest jurists and legal scholars, Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr. Holmes believed in eugenics and even dysgenics (execution of those whom he regarded as “feeble-minded,” “undesirable,” and “inadequate”). READ MORE..
A tsunami of vaccine bills flooded
the legislatures of 36 states in the
nation this year. Clearly, this orchestrated
wave of vaccine bills emanates
from an initiative driven by national
and international forces. Read more..Vaccines Acres USA October15_Opinion
..
There a medical directive cards that you have in your wallet, just in case you are in an accident and get taken to a medical facility. You might already have a medical directive card of for diabetes or blood transfusions, etc.
“The Advance Vaccine Directive is a valid Advance Health Directive or Living Will binding on the medical community under the law of Informed Consent. The Wallet Card our legal team developed is based on the latest US Supreme Court “I Do Not Consent” case, Missouri vs McNeely (2013). It covers circumstances in which you may find yourself facing not-consented vaccination, such as being brought into an ER unconscious and being subjected to immediate vaccination.”
.
The essential importance of asserting the Right Informed Consent to preserve it is shown by the 2013 US Supreme Court case of Missouri vs McNeely, where the warrantless extraction of blood was ruled illegal as the defendant “refused to consent.” Had McNeely remained silent, the blood test would have been allowed – http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/12pdf/11-1425_cb8e.pdf
.
Even “…diminished expectation of privacy does not diminish their privacy interest in preventing a government agent from piercing their skin. And though a blood test conducted in a medical setting by trained personnel is less intrusive than other bodily invasions, this Court has never retreated from its recognition that any compelled intrusion into the human body implicates significant, constitutionally protected privacy interests…” (page 15). – Ralph Fucetola JD
VLA comment:
As you know hospitals today are vaccinating inbound patients. Protect yourself on admissions by presenting this card.
If you are pregnant, this is a must have ready on your admissions ….one for yourself and your emerging baby.
You might think that $25.00 is a high price to pay for a laminated card, but lots of legal research and efforts by Dr. Laibow and her foundation has gone into developing this strategy. And moreso, Dr. Laibow and her foundation has been a leading driver on the vaccine issue for decades, including international involvement. Give her the money:::))) and let her continue the activism that perhaps you don’t have time for. As Julian Assange said in his latest interview….transfer some of the money you make at your worldly occupation to those who are taking care of other issues that need the attention that you cannot give. (paraphrase)
Book Discussion on The Wikileaks Files
Julian Assange talked about his book, The WikiLeaks Files: The World According to US Empire, in which he lays out the information contained in the documents published to the WikiLeaks website in 2010. Mr. Assange spoke via video link from London: http://www.c-span.org/video/?328099-1/julian-assange-wikileaks-files
BUY THIS BOOK AND ADD TO THE FINANCIAL POOL OF FREE JOURNALISM