A key congressional spending panel has fired a shot across the bow of two federally chartered medical foundations, warning them that the way they disclose information about donors may not pass muster. It’s the latest controversy involving the traditionally low-profile foundations, which over the past quarter-century have funneled nearly $2 billion to the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) for research, clinical trials, training, and educational programs. When Congress created the Foundation for the National Institutes of Health and the CDC Foundation in the early 1990s to raise private funds to support federal biomedical and health research, it ordered them to report “the source and amount of all gifts” they receive, as well as any restrictions on how the donations could be used. But legislators on the House of Representatives appropriations subcommittee that oversees NIH and CDC are worried the foundations may not be following those rules.
Robert F. Kennedy Jr. claims the CDC owns patents on at least 57 different vaccines, and profits $4.1 billion per year in vaccination sales.
According to RFK Jr., the CDC is not an independent government agency but is actually a subsidiary of Big Pharma.
“Upon cursory review of the patents, I found that one did not seem applicable to vaccination, but merely referenced an article on vaccination. That leaves us with 56 CDC patents to scrutinize. Here is what I found.
There are CDC patents applicable to vaccines for Flu, Rotavirus, Hepatitis A, HIV, Anthrax, Rabies, Dengue fever, West Nile virus, Group A Strep, Pneumococcal disease, Meningococcal disease, RSV, Gastroenteritis, Japanese encephalitis, SARS, Rift Valley Fever, and chlamydophila pneumoniae.
Introduction: A Research Analyst insider reports findings that the Universal Varicella Vaccination Program alters the epidemiology of herpes zoster (shingles); and details ways in which the CDC, in collusion with the Los Angeles Department of Health Services (LADHS)—the Acute Communicable Disease Control unit—apparently manipulated data to conceal unwanted outcomes that supported an immunologically-mediated link between varicella and herpes zoster(HZ) epidemiology.
Dr. Gary Goldman: The reason why we are getting SHINGLES
The only reason that “children who get the chickenpox vaccine APPEAR to have a much lower risk of shingles” is that the live vaccine has provided these children with a recent boost to their immunity. However, the vaccine-strain of varicella zoster virus (VZV)–also known as the Oka strain–is genetically different from the wild-type U.S. strain. When a vaccinated child is exposed to an adult with shingles or a child with wild-type varicella, if the strains are sufficiently heterologous, the vaccinated child will break out in chickenpox. It is also possible for the weakened vaccine-strain to revert to a more virulent strain that manifests wild-type pathology. This means when children are exposed to the wild-type strain, even though they may not have a breakthrough infection with chickenpox, they now harbor two heterologous (genetically different) strains of VZV–both of which are at a later time subject to reactivation as shingles. Thus, as they age, they will be even more likely to reactivate with shingles (unless periodically administered booster vaccine doses for life in order to maintain the immunity)–especially if they do not receive exogenous (outside) boosts to their cell-mediated immunity which, in the pre-vaccine era, came from expostures to other children infected with wild-type varicella which provided the adult with a subclinical boost that helped to suppress or postpone reactivattion of shingles.
I would also like to clear up the point that shingles has always been increasing–even prior to the licensing of the varicella vaccine. This statement is true; however, the increases were on the order of 2 to 4% per year (which were likely due to an aging population, or greater access to healthcare). Once a community had widespread distribution of varicella vaccine, increases in herpes zoster were on the order of 20% per year. For example, this source [Yih WK, Brooks DR, Lett SM, et al. The incidence of varicella and herpes zoster in Massachusetts as measured by the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) during a period of increasing varicella vaccine coverage, 1998-2003. BMC Public Health 2005; 5:68.
32. Schmid DS, Jumaan AO. Impact of varicella vaccine on varicella-zoster virus dynamics. Clin Microbiol Rev 2010; 23(1):202–217] found a 90% increase in shingles over 5 years (1999-2003).
CDC Study Shows Up to 7.7 Times the Risk of Miscarriage After Influenza Vaccine
Figures show a statistically significant increase in miscarriages when women received their flu shot. The median gestational age for spontaneous abortion was 7 weeks in the affected pregnancies.
CDC 2017 Study: Association of spontaneous abortion with receipt of inactivated influenza vaccine containing H1N1pdm09 in 2010-11 and 2011-12
James G. Donahuea, , , Burney A. Kiekea, , Jennifer P. Kinga, , Frank DeStefanob, , Maria A. Mascolac, , Stephanie A. Irvingd, , T. Craig Cheethame, , Jason M. Glanzf
Commentary by Jim Stone Miscarriages Jim Stone
Abstract introductions Inactivated influenza vaccine is recommended in any stage of pregnancy, but evidence of safety in early pregnancy is limited, including for vaccines containing A/H1N1pdm2009 (pH1N1) antigen. We sought to determine if receipt of vaccine containing pH1N1 was associated with spontaneous abortion (SAB)
The study says 7.7, for those of you counting at home, that’s not a “hint”, that’s a giant disturbing alarm (which is why the damage control is being rolled out en masse today). Women who had received the two flu shots in successive seasons were almost 8x more likely to have a spontaneous abortion than those who had not — a nearly 700% increase.
Stay tuned for a complete analysis…its worse than it appears!
See: Study by Gary Goldman in the 2009/2010 H1N1pdm2009 year of a 4,250% increase in miscarriages with a double dose of flu vaccine, H1N1 and Seasonal Flu shot.
See: CDC COVER UP of the 2009/2010 miscarriages
Scientists Preserving Integrity, Diligence and Ethics in Research writer letter to top CDC administrators
CDC “Spider” Scientists attack the CDC, blow the lid off
They write a letter to the CDC chief of staff
And I write a letter to them
by Jon Rappoport
January 15, 2017
(Update: for Part-2, click here)
There is a group of anonymous scientists at the US Centers for Disease Control—they call themselves the Spider Group—Scientists Preserving Integrity, Diligence and Ethics in Research. They have penned a letter to the CDC’s chief of staff, Carmen S. Villar:
Here is the explosive accusation they make:
“We are a group of scientists at CDC that are very concerned about the current state of ethics at our agency. It appears that our mission is being influenced and shaped by outside parties and rogue interests. It seems that our mission and Congressional intent for our agency is being circumvented by some of our leaders. What concerns us most, is that it is becoming the norm and not the rare exception.”
“Some senior management officials at CDC are clearly aware and even condone these behaviors. Others see it and turn the other way. Some staff are intimidated and pressed to do things they know are not right.”
“We have representatives from across the agency that witness this unacceptable behavior. It occurs at all levels and in all of our respective units. These questionable and unethical practices threaten to undermine our credibility and reputation as a trusted leader in public health.” Read more…
You can read the full Spider Group’s letter here at US Right To Know. (More on the letter by Carey Gillam here.)
EXCERPT: Robert Kennedy, Jr. “All the things that I do are bent on forcing this [vaccine] debate out into the open—because once the science is in the open, the CDC’s position is so fragile, it’s an edifice of fraud, fraud stacked upon fraud, so high and so wobbly, that even a slight breeze of public scrutiny will topple it.”
Attorneys Bryan Smith and Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., of Morgan & Morgan, have been seeking to have Dr. Thompson testify in a medical malpractice case to explain how the CDC committed scientific fraud in a series of studies, which found no link between vaccines and autism.
In denying the request, Dr. Frieden said, “Dr. William Thompson’s deposition testimony would not substantially promote the objectives of CDC or HHS [Health and Human Services].”
Note: Dr. Thompson wants to reveal the scientific fraud and destruction of evidence that took place in the studies that he co-authored. However, in accordance with the Whistle Blower Protection Act and other federal regulations, Dr. Thompson can not testify under oath without the permission of the director of the CDC, Dr. Thomas Frieden.
Re: “Dr. William Thompson’s deposition testimony would not substantially promote the objectives of CDC or HHS [Health and Human Services].” VLA Comment: Isn’t that the point!!!!
If Donald Trump becomes president he will appoint the US attorney general who will investigate the CDC fraud:
Trump Wakefield: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xk1pF75mY8A
- Press Release January 24, 2014 CDC (reprinted below)
- Misleads Nation’s Ob/Gyns -Covering-up Of The Most Massive Fetal Death Reports Associated With The Influenza Vaccine in the History of Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) Dr. Goldman study: study: Comparison of VAERS fetal-loss reports during three consecutive influenza seasons: was there a synergistic fetal toxicity associated with the two-vaccine 2009/2010 season?
- Goldman GS. Hum Exp Toxicol. 2013 May;32(5):464-75. doi: 10.1177/0960327112455067. Epub 2012 Sep 27.
- Official transcript CDC’s Dr. Marie McCormick denies miscarriages, Sept. 3, 2010 ACCV. See page 35.
- Influenza Vaccine Safety Monitoring (slide 20) Dr. Tom Shimabukuro (CDC) confirms NCOW data , Oct. 28, 2010 ACIP
- March of Dimes Joint CDC letter to the nation’s OB/GYNs urging them to vaccinate pregnant women the following season despite the VAERS reports of miscarriages and stillbirths associated with the flu vaccine.
- Letter to Elsevier, publisher of AJOG documenting the CDC cover up, world wide publicity campaign based on a misleading and collusive AJOG’s publishing of the Pedro Moro study.
- World Wide CDC misleading Publicity Campaign based on Pedro Moro’s misleading study in AJOG
- Published CDC Cover up article with documents by Christina England VAERS Database — Miscarriages & Stillbirths
DR. EVANS: Thank you, Dr. McCormick. I may have missed this earlier. Is there any data regarding pregnant women and adverse events associated with the vaccine? DR. MCCORMICK: Sure, there is one system that has been specifically set up for this. This is based on the congenital malformation monitoring system called VAMPS, vaccines and medical something or other in pregnant women surveillance. This system is up and running but we have seen no data from it because they are actually going to be following these people out through infancy. We did have data from the VSD, Vaccine Safety Data Network, and from PRISM, which is this new system that is set up between the immunization logs and medical records of insurance companies. They did provide data on pregnant women. We saw no adverse events, no signals in pregnant women.
VLA Comment: What the purposely avoided was their most common practice for all vaccine injuries was to report the data in VAERS which easily showed, right from the start of the program an enormous increase in miscarriages until it reached 4,250%. VAERS is the data used in all vaccine injuries, including pregnant women. Our investigation shows that the CDC was aware of the data but did not want to destroy their pregnancy program by confessing or alerting the nation’s Ob/Gyn’s. Hence they made up this story that their was another credible data source that showed no increases in miscarriages. However, the CDC had to come clean with the VAERS data after NCOW exposed them. (See Dr. Shimbakuro’s slide)
CDC Misleads Nations Ob/Gyns -Covering-up Of The Most Massive Fetal Death Reports Associated With The Influenza Vaccine in the History of Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) Dr. Gary Goldman’s study on the 4,250% spike in fetal death reports during the 2009/10 H1N1 “pandemic” originally rejected by the American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology (AJOG), who is charged by the National Coalition of Organized Women (NCOW) as complicit in a massive cover-up and manipulation of data associated with the 2009/10 flu season fetal deaths is now available free to the public. Subsequently published in the Human & Experimental Toxicology Journal (HET), as a Sage choice study, the Goldman study is now listed in Pub med as a free PMC article. Comparison of VAERS fetal-loss reports during three consecutive influenza seasons: was there a synergistic fetal toxicity associated with the two-vaccine 2009/2010 season? Goldman GS. Hum Exp Toxicol. 2013 May;32(5):464-75. Despite an apparent trail of documented collusion and misconduct amongst the CDC, AJOG (Elsevier) and 9 non-profits including the March of Dimes, this alarmingly poor outcome of the 2009/10 H1N1vaccine experiment on the fetuses of pregnant women was successfully covered up by the CDC until Goldman exposed the statistics, documenting the harm in his recent publication. Ob/Gyns, who, uninformed, continued to double-dose their pregnant patients with the fetal-fatal flu shots that collectively delivered up to 50 micrograms of mercury. Due to the success of this well-orchestrated cover up and the complicity of the non profits and AJOG, pregnant women are now pressured to get 4 vaccine doses, (Flu, TDaP) and thereafter are mandated to give up to 49 vaccine doses to their surviving children in order for them to attend school. Beyond Junk Science. Continue to read cover up
Of the 41 792 adverse event reports submitted, 39 568 (95%) were for children younger than 7 years. 38 381 of the reports for children in this age group (97%) were for simultaneous vaccination with IPV and other vaccines (most commonly pneumococcal and acellular pertussis vaccines), whereas standalone IPV vaccines accounted for 0·5% of all reports.
It must be noted that these authors, Pedro Moro and Dr. Shimabakuru work for the CDC.
Pedro Moro, MD is the author that covered up and truncated his data on the 2009/10 H1N1 Pandemic vaccine for pregnant women failing to extend his range of study to the 2009/10 year, stopping the range at the 2008/9 season giving the impression that the flu safe was safe for pregnant women. His title for the H1N1 pandemic study indicated it covered 2009 in the title leading OB/Gyns to believe it covered the 2009 pandemic which it did not. Because he stopped short of reporting on the 2009/10 (the actual year of the faux pandemic), he led the nation’s ob/gyn’s to believe the flu shot was safe for pregnant women.
Tom Shimabakuru, MD presented his finding (CDC) to a public group in Atlanta, Georgia in 2012. He presented the VAERS data for the 2009/10 H1N1 PANDEMIC season. He did not present the data on pregnant women until questioned by a member of the public. He then pulled out a separate slide that indicated that there was indeed a 4,250% increase in miscarraiges and stillbirths associated with the flu shots given to pregnant women. One wonders the pregnancy data of 4,250% increase in spontaneous abortions was hidden from the public while Guillian Barre and other adverse reactions that amounted to a 3% increase in incidents were presented.
See documentation of the cover up by Dr. Pedro Moro