Edward Snowden: Fabulous Interview on New Book (sept. 2019)
Leave a reply
Suicide and Murder — Side Effects of Medication
Suicide and Murder — Side Effects of Medication
Story at-a-glance
- 1 in 6 Americans between the ages of 18 and 85 were on psychiatric drugs in 2013, most of them antidepressants. The highest rates of depression are reported among 18- to 25-year-olds. Suicide rates are at an all-time high as well, rising 31% between 2001 and 2017
- While antidepressants are routinely used as a first-line treatment for depression, studies show their effectiveness is on par with placebo, while serious side effects are often ignored or hidden
- Violence, including suicide and homicide, is a serious side effect of at least 25 different psychiatric drugs, some of which are now given to young children, toddlers and even babies
- The proportion of adults taking at least one drug where suicide is a potential side effect hit 23.5% as of 2013; 38.4% of American adults were in 2014 on one or more medications that can cause depression as a side effect
- Eli Lilly paid victims of Paxil-induced violence to shield damaging data about another drug that could have influenced the jury’s determination about Lilly’s responsibility in a 1989 mass-shooting
Read more….
Pharmacogenetics…oops wrong medication
-
Psychiatric drugs and some general medications
have effects that are not always the ones intended.
Reactions to different drugs and drug-drug combinations
are governed by individual metabolising rates. Phase 1
metabolism takes place via the cytochrome P450 enzymes
with 57 human genes identified that are genetically
variable i.e. polymorphic. The population are coded as
poor, extensive (known as normal), intermediate or ultra
rapid metabolisers.STUDY: Brogan-Treatment Emergent Violence to Self and Others.
- VLA Comment: Go to our PHARMACOGENETICS ROOM and see our studies
PHOTOS: VACCINE LIBERATION ARMY
TRUMP UKRAINE PHONE TRANSCRIPT: A National Treasure to be saved!
Update: Fukushima has contaminated the entire Pacific Ocean
Ben Swann: Truth and Media- California Vaccine Mandate Laws-Removing Doctors authority to grant medical waivers
HOMESCHOOL STATES THAT MANDATE VACCINATION
Homeschooling regulations by state
HSLDA, a homeschooling advocacy organization, has created a map showing which states require the most regulation.
- States requiring no notice to the school district about homeschooling include Alaska, Connecticut, Idaho, Illinois, Iowa, Indiana, Michigan, Missouri, New Jersey, Oklahoma and Texas.
- States with low regulation include California, Nevada, Utah, Arizona, New Mexico, Montana, Wyoming, Nebraska, Kansas, Arkansas, Wisconsin, Kentucky, Mississippi, Alabama, Georgia and Delaware.
- States with moderate regulation (parental notification, plus test scores and/or professional student progress evaluations must be sent to the district) include Hawaii, Washington, Oregon, Colorado, North Dakota, South Dakota, Minnesota, Louisiana, Florida, Ohio, Virginia, West Virginia, Tennessee, North Carolina, South Carolina, New Hampshire, Maine, Maryland and Washington, D.C.
- States with high regulation (all the above regulations, plus other requirements — e.g., curriculum approval by the state, teacher qualification of parents or home visits by state officials) include Massachusetts, New York, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island and Vermont.
- 4 states require homeschool parents to submit proof of immunization (MN, ND, PA, TN)
- 11 states require homeschooled students to be immunized but do not require homeschool parents to submit proof of immunization (CO, IL, IN, KS, KY, MT, NM, NC, TX, VA, WY)
- 9 states have multiple homeschool options with conflicting requirements (AK, FL, IA, LA, ME, MD, MI, NE, WA)
- 26 states do not require homeschoolers to be immunized (AL, AZ, AR, CA, CT, DE, GA, HI, ID, MA, MI, MO, NV, NH, NJ, NY, OH, OK, OR, RI, SC, SD, UT, VT, WV, WI)
-
Find Your State
New Mobile Fleet participant Photo
People of Maine to vote against Vaccine Mandate Law… in 2020 election
93,000 People in Maine Sign Petition to Veto New Vaccine Bill Taking Away Parental Rights
On Friday, September 18, 2019, Mainers for Health and Parental Rights held a press conference at the Capitol of Maine to announce they had obtained 93,000 signatures to support their grass-roots effort, Veto 798 Maine.
According to their website, 798 is:
a bill that was pushed through the legislature despite overwhelming opposition from the citizens of Maine, and then quietly signed into law by Governor Mills in May of 2019.
LD798 threatens all of our rights including:
- Informed consent for medical decision making
- Parental rights
- Equal access to education
- Religious freedom
LD798 eliminates religious and philosophical exemptions to vaccination, prohibiting parents, staff and healthcare workers from exercising their right to decline one or more vaccines required by schools and employers. If Maine citizens do not comply with the new law, they face expulsion from all public, private, parochial and online schools and will be terminated from employment.
To get the “Peoples’ Veto” on the ballot for March, 2020, they were required to obtain 64,000 signatures from Maine residents within 90 days, September 18th.
With 800+ volunteers, they obtained over 93,000 signatures – nearly 7% of the population of Maine.
The people of Maine will now apparently have the opportunity to vote and veto this law next March. READ MORE…
Answering questions on California medical exemption law 2019
Caesar Has Spoken! The Cali. Department of Public Health Provides Answers to (Some of) Your Questions about Vaccine Medical Exemptions
Excerpt: In short: despite the hopeful language in the FAQ answers, my view is that essentially none of the exemptions written by the vaccine aware physicians are compliant with the conventional standard of care, as set forth in the Red Book and the above lettered organizations or standards.
One of the reasons I think this is that the conventional standard of care does not recognized the concept of a medically or vaccine fragile child for which it is too dangerous to give any vaccine over the course of childhood. The new law makes clear that exemptions have to be vaccine specific based on the above guidelines which is the (conventional) standard of care.
READ…
California lawFAQ questions and answers from CA Public Health Agency