How Can “Inexperienced, Underpaid, Overworked” Social Workers Make Life-changing Decisions in Removing Children from Parents?
DCFS’ belief that they can operate in complete secrecy is downright scary. What can be so secret, that DCFS would ask that a state senator be excluded from the courtroom? The law seems to be clear. I have been invited to the exact same courtroom in the past, to view the exact same kind of cases, when the court was interested in my help. I can’t tell the public what happened there. What is it, that your representatives should not see happening? What makes an agency believe they have that kind of unbridled power?
Let’s not forget that I became involved in investigating DCFS when the agency refused to give me information about a case. The law clearly states, it turns out, that they have to. It is peculiar how they memorize the secrecy parts and not the sharing parts.
Most do not know that I had to hold the DCFS budget to get that information and the whole Arkansas legislature had to back me to force them to comply. They are clearly more secretive than they have to be. They are clearly more secretive than the law allows. If we saw this on the evening news going on in another country, we would for a moment be thankful that our country did not allow secret police that could disrupt our lives without due process. We would be thankful we are Americans. READ MORE…
…any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such:
(a) Killing members of the group;
(b) Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group;
(c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part;
(d) Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group;
(e) Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.
Whether or not you believe in the power of the human mind to connect with Source and withdraw information about the future, things are lining up in such a way that Cayce’s prophecies regarding Russia are proving quite prescient now, giving us a clue that at least we shouldn’t hold on too tightly to any preconceived notions about what will happen in coming years. Read more…
1) HOLT’S DEBATE QUESTIONS DELIVERED TO CLINTON PRIOR TO DEBATE
Sources are now reporting that Hillary Clinton was given the debate questions a week in advance. https://conservativedailypost.com/debate-was-staged-hillary-given-questions-weeks-in-advance/
Reports are arguing that an NBC Intern was seen delivering a package to Clinton’s campaign headquarters in New York. Given Hillary’s troubles with emails, it makes perfect sense that they would deliver their information by hand to avoid hacking or getting caught. It is being reported that the Intern walked into the headquarters, and went directly into the personal office of Clinton campaign manager Robert Mook. The Intern was spotted wearing a FedEx outfit, but a reporter working with Fox News recognized her and immediately reported what he saw. When the Fox News reporter raised questions, Clinton’s staff called him “ignorant” and ushered him out of the office and away from their building. The Fox News reporter argues that he stuck around and did not see a FedEx truck anywhere in sight the entire time.
VIDEO # 1 HILLARY’S MAN SNEAKS EQUIPMENT OUT OF PODIUM
Just look at the first few minutes…at least til 4:20. One of Hillary’s men (white hair & mustache) sneaks back and forth then finds the opportunity to take something out of the podium will be covered by Bill & Hillary.
3) VIDEO #2 Same man (white hair & mustache) takes Hillary’s note pad and covertly gives it to Lester Holt.
start at 3:38 The same man take Hillary’s notes out of her podium, waits until he make eye contact with Holt and then slips him Hillary’s notes.
4) VIDEO #3 Hillary had what is alleged to be a specific antenna under her pants suit:
Watch the video.The investigator has come to the conclusion that Hillary is wearing wireless gear that runs an antennae up her back and ends at her neck. He suggests that due to her relationship with companies like Google, she has 2 flat buds on her scalp/occipital lobe, hidden by her hairdo, with an antennae running up her spine in order to have a secure frequency/secure line .
5) Darpa: Contact lens?
Now for the first time, the Lame Cherry will explain what Mrs. Clinton was reacting to. She did not have an earwig as in the first debate, but instead had an advanced in production contact lens which literally was running like a teleprompter.
That is why the sentences were in bursts and complete. It was the exact pattern of a United Nations translator which everyone has heard, when you are being fed one line of information and you have to speak it.
This is termed augmented contact lenses, and are in production and DARPA or the futurist military development group has been developing even more advanced systems for years.
US military developing multi-focus augmented reality contactlenses; US military developing multi-focus augmented realitycontact … Beyond military applications, …
… company specializing in display technology based on eyewear andcontactlenseshas sealed … on high-tech contactlenses … sets designed for the military.
